Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 10;91(3-S):92-105.
doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i3-S.9434.

Passive air sampling: the use of the index of microbial air contamination

Affiliations
Review

Passive air sampling: the use of the index of microbial air contamination

Isabella Viani et al. Acta Biomed. .

Abstract

Background: Bioaerosol plays an important role in human life with potentially infectious, allergic and toxic effects. Active and passive methods can be used to assess microbial air contamination, but so far there is not a unanimous consensus regarding the indications about methods to be used and how to interpret the results. The passive method has been standardized by the Index of Microbial Air contamination (IMA). Classes of contamination and maximum acceptable levels of IMA have been proposed, related to different infection or contamination risks. The aim of this study was to provide information about the use of the passive sampling method, with reference to the IMA standard.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus for articles published until January 2020 reporting the citation of the article by Pasquarella et al. "The index of microbial air contamination. J Hosp Infect 2000". Only studies in English language where the IMA standard was applied were considered. Studies regarding healthcare settings were excluded.

Results: 27 studies were analyzed; 12 were performed in Europe, 8 in Asia, 5 in Africa, 2 in America. Cultural heritage sites, educational buildings and food industries were the most common indoor monitored environments; in 8 studies outdoor air was monitored.

Conclusions: This review has provided a picture of the application of standard IMA in different geographic areas and different environments at risk of airborne infection/contamination. The analysis of the results obtained, together with a wider collection of data, will provide a useful contribution towards the definition of reference limits for the various types of environments to implement targeted preventive measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Each author declares that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of study selection for review.

References

    1. Douwes J, Thorne P, Pearce N, Heederik D. Bioaerosols health effects and exposure assessment: progress and perspectives. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003;47(3):187–200. - PubMed
    1. Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. Airborne bioaerosols and their impact on human health. J Environ Sci. 2018;67:23–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai Km, Emberlin J, Colbeck J. Outdoor environments and human pathogens in the air. Environ Health. 2009;8(Suppl 1):S15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mora M, Mahnert A, Koskinen K, Pausan MR, Oberauner-Wappis L, et al. Microorganisms in Confined Habitats: Microbial Monitoring and Control of Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, Cleanrooms and the International Space Station. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1573. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mandrioli P, Caneva G, Sabbioni C. Cultural heritage and aerobiology. Methods and measurement techniques for biodeterioration monitoring. Kluver, Dordrecht. 2003

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources