Influence of socioeconomic status on the referral process to cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 32276957
- PMCID: PMC7170636
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036088
Influence of socioeconomic status on the referral process to cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and referral to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after incident acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by dividing the referral process into three phases: (1) informed about CR, (2) willingness to participate in CR, (3) and assigned CR setting.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Department of Cardiology at a Danish University Hospital from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014.
Participants: A total of 1229 patients assessed for CR during hospitalisation with ACS were prospectively registered in the Rehab-North Register from 2011 to 2014. SES was assessed using data from national registers, concerning: personal income, occupational status, educational level and civil status. Patients were excluded if one of the following criteria was fulfilled: (1) missing data on SES, or (2) acceptable reason for not informing patients about CR (treatment with coronary artery bypass grafting, transfer to another hospital, still under treatment or death).
Main outcome measures: Outcomes were defined by dividing the referral process into three phases: (1) informed about CR, (2) willingness to participate, and (3) assigned CR setting (in-hospital/community centre) after ACS.
Results: A total of 854 (69.5 %) patients were referred to CR. After adjustment for age, gender, ACS diagnosis (ST-elevated myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris) and comorbidity, high income had the strongest association of referral to CR in all three phases (informed about CR: OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.64; willingness to participate in CR: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.35; assigned in-hospital CR: OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.36). Educational level showed similar tendencies, however not statistically significant. The results did not vary according to gender.
Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate the referral process to CR using a three-phase structure. It suggests income and education to influence all phases in the referral process to CR after ACS.
Keywords: adult cardiology; cardiac epidemiology; myocardial infarction.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Social inequality and barriers to cardiac rehabilitation in the rehab-North register.Scand Cardiovasc J. 2017 Dec;51(6):316-322. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2017.1385838. Epub 2017 Oct 11. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2017. PMID: 29019280
-
Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort.BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 3;8(1):e018934. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29301762 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome in a referral hospital in sub-Saharan Africa.Cardiovasc J Afr. 2019 Jan/Feb 23;30(1):29-33. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2018-066. Epub 2018 Dec 4. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2019. PMID: 30534849
-
Effectiveness of discharge education strategies versus usual care on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review.JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Feb;18(2):309-331. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00042. JBI Evid Synth. 2020. PMID: 32229737
-
Cardiac Rehabilitation and Survival for Ischemic Heart Disease.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Nov 6;23(12):184. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01616-x. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021. PMID: 34741670 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Advances, Challenges, and Progress in Cardiac Rehabilitation in Chronic CVD Management.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 Jun;25(6):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01100-7. Epub 2023 Apr 11. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023. PMID: 37040008 Review.
-
To what extend is socioeconomic status associated with not taking up and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation: a population-based follow-up study.BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 21;12(6):e060924. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060924. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35728905 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation: Effect Modification by Household Income.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e025591. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025591. Epub 2022 Jun 22. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35730601 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Aug 16;16:2361-2376. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S418803. eCollection 2023. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023. PMID: 37605772 Free PMC article.
-
The Accessibility and Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation in COVID-19 Pandemic Era.Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug;48(4):249-258. doi: 10.5535/arm.240021. Epub 2024 Jul 30. Ann Rehabil Med. 2024. PMID: 39074836 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical