Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;44(10):1050-1054.
doi: 10.1111/aor.13702. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

A case series of patients with left ventricular assist devices and concomitant mechanical heart valves

Tareq Al Saadi  1 , Ambar Andrade  2 , Krystina Chickerillo  2 , Anjali Joshi  2 , Christopher Sciamanna  2 , Sunil Pauwaa  2 , Gregory Macaluso  2 , Muhyaldeen Dia  2 , William Cotts  2 , Antone Tatooles  3 , Patroklos Pappas  3
Affiliations

A case series of patients with left ventricular assist devices and concomitant mechanical heart valves

Tareq Al Saadi et al. Artif Organs. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Mechanical heart valves left in situ at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are thought to potentially increase the risk of thromboembolism. Recommendations exist to replace dysfunctional mechanical mitral valves and any mechanical aortic valves at the time of LVAD implantation. Due to potential increases in cardiopulmonary bypass time and associated comorbidities with valve replacement, leaving a functional mechanical valve in place at LVAD implantation has been suggested to be a safe option. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with prior mechanical mitral or aortic valves undergoing LVAD implantation at our center between 2012 and 2017. Echocardiograms were read by a single cardiologist to assess for mechanical valve dysfunction. We identified 15 patients. Five patients had major bleeding requiring transfusion. On follow-up, 2 patients had hemorrhagic stroke and 2 had transient ischemic attach/ischemic stroke. In addition, 2 patients had LVAD thrombosis and 2 patients had LVAD driveline malfunction. Mild mechanical valve regurgitation was identified on follow-up echocardiograms of 2 patients. Rate of complications in patients with mechanical valves undergoing LVAD implantation was comparable to that reported for the general LVAD population. Leaving a functional mechanical valve in place at the time of LVAD implantation could be a reasonable alternative to valve replacement. More data are required to further guide patient care in these individuals.

Keywords: left ventricular assist devices; mechanical circulatory support; mechanical heart valves.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Mohamed A, Mehta N, Eisen HJ. New role of mechanical assist device as bridge to transplant: USA perspective. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2017;22:231-5.
    1. Swartz MT, Lowdermilk GA, Moroney DA, McBride LR. Ventricular assist device support in patients with mechanical heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2248-51.
    1. Mokashi SA, Schmitto JD, Lee LS, Rawn JD, Bolman RM, Shekar PS, et al. Ventricular assist device in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Artif Organs. 2010;34:1030-4.
    1. Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, Birks E, Lietz K, Moore SA, et al. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2013;32:157-87.
    1. Potapov EV, Antonides C, Crespo-Leiro MG, Combes A, Färber G, Hannan MM, et al. 2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2019;56:230-70.

LinkOut - more resources