The Serially-Operated Essex-Lopresti Injury: Long-Term Outcomes in a Retrospective Cohort
- PMID: 32280182
- PMCID: PMC7141907
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401380
The Serially-Operated Essex-Lopresti Injury: Long-Term Outcomes in a Retrospective Cohort
Abstract
Objective The main aim of this article is to report 10-year outcomes after Essex-Lopresti injury (ELI). Study Design Retrospective case series. Two level I trauma centers and one associated community hospital from 2003 to 2016. Patients Sixteen patients who sustained an ELI and were treated at one of our three regional hospitals. Intervention Initially, 4 patients (25%) were treated nonoperatively by immobilization and 12 patients (75%) were treated operatively. Proximal surgery included radial head open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty, radial head excision and forearm ORIF, and wound debridement. Ten patients (63%) were acutely identified with longitudinal forearm instability. Of these, four patients had the distal radioulnar joint pinned. In the other six patients, the forearm was immobilized. Overall, 16 patients underwent a total of 32 revision surgeries. Main Outcome Measure Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE) Physical score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score for pain-severity, and NRS score for satisfaction of overall outcome. Results Follow-up for outcome evaluation was available for 10 patients, at a median of 10 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.0-12) years after date of injury. The median PROMIS UE Physical score was 36 (IQR: 33-38). Median NRS score for pain-severity on average was 5 (IQR: 0-6). The median NRS score for satisfaction of overall outcome was 7 (IQR: 5-8). Conclusion Patients who sustain an ELI generally have substantial deficits of upper extremity function as measured by PROMIS UE. Early radial head arthroplasty may be beneficial, but further study in a larger cohort is needed. Outcomes of nonoperative treatment and operative treatment were similar and suggest that current surgical treatments are incomplete.
Keywords: Essex-Lopresti; distal radioulnar joint disruption; interosseous membrane rupture; longitudinal forearm dissociation.
© Thieme Medical Publishers.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethical ApprovalConflict of Interest The Institutional Review Board of our institution approved this study under protocol no. 1999P008705. None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Essex-Lopresti P. Fractures of the radial head with distal radio-ulnar dislocation; report of two case. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33B(02):244–247. - PubMed
-
- Dodds S D, Yeh P C, Slade JF I I. Essex-Lopresti injurie. Hand Clin. 2008;24(01):125–137. - PubMed
-
- Venouziou A I, Papatheodorou L K, Weiser R W, Sotereanos D G. Chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries: an alternative treatment metho. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(06):861–866. - PubMed
-
- Edwards G S, Jr, Jupiter J B. Radial head fractures with acute distal radioulnar dislocation. Essex-Lopresti revisite. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(234):61–69. - PubMed
-
- Grassmann J P, Hakimi M, Gehrmann S V et al.The treatment of the acute Essex-Lopresti injur. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(10):1385–1391. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
