Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 24:2020:3739075.
doi: 10.1155/2020/3739075. eCollection 2020.

The Clinical Relevance of p16 and p53 Status in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva

Affiliations

The Clinical Relevance of p16 and p53 Status in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva

Ellen L Barlow et al. J Oncol. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of HPV status in vulvar squamous cell carcinomas (VSCC) and to determine whether preoperative determination of p16 or p53 status would have clinical relevance.

Methods: Patients treated for VSCC at a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia, from 2002 to 2014, were retrospectively evaluated (n = 119). Histological specimens were stained for p53 and p16 expression, and HPV status was determined by PCR detection of HPV DNA.

Results: HPV DNA was detected in 19%, p16 expression in 53%, and p53 expression in 37% of patients. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates indicated that p16/HPV-positive patients had superior five-year disease-free survival (76% versus 42%, resp., p = 0.004) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (89% versus 75% resp., p = 0.05) than p53-positive patients. In univariate analysis, nodal metastases (p < 0.001), tumor size >4 cm (p = 0.03), and perineural invasion (p = 0.05) were associated with an increased risk of disease progression and p16 expression with a decreased risk (p = 0.03). In multivariable analysis, only nodal metastases remained independent for risk of disease progression (p = 0.01). For DSS, lymph node metastases (p < 0.001) and tumor size (p = 0.008) remained independently prognostic.

Conclusion: The p16/HPV and p53 status of VSCC allows separation of patients into two distinct clinicopathological groups, although 10% of patients fall into a third group which is HPV, p16, and p53 negative. p16 status was not independently prognostic in multivariable analysis. Treatment decisions should continue to be based on clinical indicators rather than p16 or p53 status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier curves for (a) five-year disease-free survival and (b) five-year disease-specific survival stratified by p16-positive and p53-positive groups.

References

    1. Jones R. W., Rowan D. M., Stewart A. W. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005;106(6):1319–1326. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000187301.76283.7f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoevenaars B. M., van der Avoort I. A. M., de Wilde P. C. M., et al. A panel of p16INK4A, MIB1 and p53 proteins can distinguish between the 2 pathways leading to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. International Journal of Cancer. 2008;123(12):2767–2773. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23857. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pinto A. P., Miron A., Yassin Y., et al. Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia contains Tp53 mutations and is genetically linked to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Modern Pathology. 2010;23(3):404–412. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.179. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Sanjosé S., Alemany L., Ordi J., et al. Worldwide human papillomavirus genotype attribution in over 2000 cases of intraepithelial and invasive lesions of the vulva. European Journal of Cancer. 2013;49(16):3450–3461. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Faber M. T., Sand F. L., Albieri V., Norrild B., Kjaer S. K., Verdoodt F. Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva. International Journal of Cancer. 2017;141(6):1161–1169. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30821. - DOI - PubMed