Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):16-21.
doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-16.

Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations
Review

Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Navin K Kapur et al. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In fact, acute myocardial infarction accounts for 81% of patients in cardiogenic shock. Despite advances in pharmacologic and device-based approaches to support patients with cardiogenic shock, no significant improvement in mortality has been observed over the past 20 years, although multiple registries are providing new insight into this complex syndrome. Key elements for optimal treatment include integration of hemodynamic and metabolic data for diagnosis and risk stratification, early evaluation and appropriate initiation of acute mechanical circulatory support devices, and an organized algorithmic approach to decision making.

Keywords: acute mechanical circulatory support; acute myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; early revascularization; risk assessment; shock classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Dr. Kapur is a formal advisor for and conducts research on behalf of Abbott, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, LivaNova, Medtronic, MD Start, and preCARDIA.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cardiogenic Shock Algorithm developed by the INOVA Heart and Vascular Institute. Republished with permission of Elsevier Science & Technology Journals, from Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock, Tehrani et al., 73(13), 2019.

Comment in

References

    1. Harjola VP, Lassus J, Sionis A et al. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 May;17(5):501–9. CardShock Study Investigators; GREAT network. - PubMed
    1. Writing Group M. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38–360. - PubMed
    1. Foth C, Mountfort S. Acute Myocardial Infarction ST Elevation (STEMI) [Internet] Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2019. Jan, [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532281. - PubMed
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018) Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):e618–e651. Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. - PubMed
    1. Vahdatpour C, Collins D, Goldberg S. Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8) e011991. - PMC - PubMed