Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):43-49.
doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-43.

Physiological Concepts of Cardiogenic Shock Using Pressure-Volume Loop Simulations: A Case-Based Review

Affiliations
Review

Physiological Concepts of Cardiogenic Shock Using Pressure-Volume Loop Simulations: A Case-Based Review

Benjamin C Salgado et al. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion that requires timely and thorough decision making. While many pathophysiologic and technical principles have been delineated in this issue, the purpose of this case-based report is to reflect upon some of these principles in the context of real-life scenarios. Given the obvious lacuna of evidence-based recommendations in CS, the authors provide a rationale for their decision-making process. The first case is a young post-heart-transplant patient with graft failure who was in a state of biventricular failure and restrictive physiology and required acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The second case is a patient who suffered a mechanical complication after experiencing an acute myocardial infarction that required MCS.

Keywords: cardiogenic shock; heart failure; mechanical support devices; pressure volume loop physiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The authors have completed and submitted the Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal Conflict of Interest Statement and none were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pressure-volume (PV) loop showing a normal left ventricle (LV; green loop) and LV with acute cardiogenic shock with a comparatively restrictive pattern (red loop). The grey and green lines represent contractility (end-systolic PV relationship; ESPVR) and grey and green curves represent ventricular elastance (end-diastolic PV relationship; EDPVR). See Online Video 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pressure-volume (PV) loop showing the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a poorly functioning left ventricle (LV; red loop). While the systemic arterial pressure has increased compared to the cardiogenic shock state (purple loop), the end-diastolic volume has increased with a significant increase in afterload (red loop). The green loop represents a normally functioning heart. Purple and green lines represent contractility (end-systolic PV relationship; ESPVR) and purple and green curves represent ventricular elastance (end-diastolic PV relationship; EDPVR). See Online Video 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A) Bedside monitor shows intermittent loss of pulsatility with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and inotrope support. (B) Chest x-ray shows congested lungs due to high left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Transesophageal echocardiogram, midesophageal four-chamber view, of a patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (without an unloading device) showing (A) stagnation with smoke at baseline that (B) resolves on promoting contractility with milrinone, reflecting the importance of aortic valve opening.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Coronary angiography of patient's left coronary system. Note the residual poor perfusion in the diffusely diseased distal left anterior descending artery.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Transthoracic echocardiogram, parasternal short-axis view, demonstrates (A) evidence of interruption of the interventricular septum and (B) color Doppler through the existent gap.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Pressure-volume (PV) loops illustrating the physiology of a ventricular septal defect (VSD). The green PV loop represents the normal state, the purple loop represents an acute heart failure state, and the red loop represents a VSD in the setting of acute heart failure. Note that the onset of a VSD has changed the shape of the PV loop, reflective of decreased afterload, shortened isovolumetric time, and higher stroke volume. Although the lines for end-systolic PV relationship (ESPVR; straight lines) and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR; bottom curves) are different compared to normal PV loop, they are the same for acute heart failure with and without a VSD, suggesting that the true myocardial properties have not changed. See Online Video 3. LV: left ventricle.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
(A) Physiological schematic representing a ventricular septal defect (VSD) with shunt flow of 4.9 L/min with a step-up in oxygenation from the left to right ventricle. (B) With increasing norepinephrine and afterload on the left ventricle, the shunt flow increases to 5.7 L/min while the forward cardiac output to the systemic circulation drops from 2.6 L/min at baseline to 1.8 L/min. See Online Video 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Pressure-volume (PV) loops illustrating the physiology of a ventricular septal defect (VSD). The green PV loop represent a normal state, purple PV loop represents acute heart failure, and the orange loop represents VSD on the setting of acute heart failure. When a TandemHeart device is placed in a patient with VSD, the PV loop (red) takes on a triangular shape secondary to proper unloading of the left-sided preload. The purple and green lines represent contractility (end-systolic PV relationship; ESPVR) and grey and green curve represent ventricular elastance (end-diastolic PV relationship; EDPVR). See Online Video 9. LV: left ventricle.

References

    1. Harvi Online [Internet] Burkhoff D, Dickstein ML, Schleicher T. c2020 [cited 2019 Dec 30]. Available from: https://harvi.online.
    1. Kapur NK, Esposito ML, Bader Y et al. Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Acute Right Ventricular Failure. Circulation. 2017 Jul 18;136(3):314–26. - PubMed
    1. Pappalardo F, Schulte C, Pieri M et al. Concomitant implantation of Impella® on top of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve survival of patients with cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;19(3):404–12. - PubMed
    1. Kaneko D, Takahashi M, Fukutomi M, Funayama H, Kario K. Additional Use of a 6F Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Was Effective in a Patient with Cardiogenic Shock with Low Pulse Pressure. Int Heart J. 2019 Sep 27;60(5):1184–8. - PubMed
    1. Cevasco M, Takayama H, Ando M, Garan AR, Naka Y, Takeda K. Left ventricular distension and venting strategies for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(4):1676–83. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances