Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 18;4(2):170-175.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.12.004. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: Need for Continuous Assessment Due to Changes in Risk During the Same Hospitalization

Rahul Chaudhary  1 , Robert Kirchoff  1 , Thomas Kingsley  1 , James S Newman  1 , Damon E Houghton  2 , Robert D McBane 2nd  2
Affiliations

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: Need for Continuous Assessment Due to Changes in Risk During the Same Hospitalization

Rahul Chaudhary et al. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore the role of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk reassessment in hospitalized medically ill patients without a change in level of care.

Patients and methods: In this exploratory retrospective study, the medical records of 171 consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) hospitalized under the medicine service for more than 3 days without a change in the level of care from January 1, 2015, to March 1, 2015, were reviewed. The primary outcome was a change in the risk score between day 1 and day 3 of hospital stay (using the Padua Prediction Score). The secondary outcomes were changes in risk stratification class (low vs high) and cost-benefit analysis.

Results: The risk score was significantly different between day 1 and day 3 (4.7±1.7 vs 4.2±1.8; P=.008). All the patients with low risk on day 1 remained at low risk on day 3. However, 25 of 136 patients (18.4%) with high risk on day 1 were reclassified as low risk on day 3 (P<.001). No patients changed from low risk to high risk at day 3. The reclassification could have saved $35 per patient-day of inappropriate pharmacological prophylaxis in addition to patient discomfort, bleeding risk, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Conclusion: This is the first study to suggest the need for regular assessment for VTE risk on medicine wards because of changing patient risk. Regular reassessment could reduce health care waste and patient discomfort.

Keywords: DVT, deep venous thrombosis; HR, hazard ratio; RR, relative risk; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Change in Padua risk prediction score between hospital days 1 and 3.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Prandoni P. Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism with low-molecular-weight heparins: clinical implications of the recent European guidelines. Thromb J. 2008;6:13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cushman M. Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis. Semin Hematol. 2007;44(2):62–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heit J.A., Crusan D.J., Ashrani A.A., Petterson T.M., Bailey K.R. Effect of a near-universal hospitalization-based prophylaxis regimen on annual number of venous thromboembolism events in the US. Blood. 2017;130(2):109–114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clagett G.P., Anderson F.A., Jr., Geerts W., et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest. 1998;114(5, suppl):531S–560S. - PubMed
    1. Rosendaal F.R. Risk factors for venous thrombotic disease. Thromb Haemost. 1999;82(2):610–619. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources