Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Spring;20(1):62-75.
doi: 10.31486/toj.19.0055.

Revised Common Rule Changes to the Consent Process and Consent Form

Leah L LeCompte  1 , Sylvia J Young  2
Affiliations
Review

Revised Common Rule Changes to the Consent Process and Consent Form

Leah L LeCompte et al. Ochsner J. 2020 Spring.

Abstract

Background: The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects-the Common Rule-was revised in 2017 to reduce administrative burdens for low-risk research while enhancing protections for human subjects enrolled in greater-than-minimal-risk trials. These enhanced protections involve changes to the consent process. Methods: We review the general requirements applicable to the consent process, as well as the additional elements of consent mandated by the revisions to the Common Rule. The regulations apply to federally funded studies and are optional for non-federally funded studies. Results: Two new general requirements for the consent process, one basic required element for the consent form, and three optional additional elements for the consent form were added in an effort to improve potential subjects' understanding of research studies and to facilitate the exchange of information between the research staff and potential subjects. Important information about the study should be extracted into a concise key information section to help potential subjects make informed decisions regarding participation. Conclusion: The revisions to the Common Rule are intended to enhance human subject protection by providing more information in an understandable form during the consent process. The new consent elements aim to increase transparency and help improve clarity.

Keywords: Consent forms; ethics committees–research; informed consent.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-.... Published April 1 8, 1979. Accessed January 21, 2019. - PubMed
    1. Nelson-Marten P, Rich BA. A historical perspective of informed consent in clinical practice and research. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1999. May;15(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/s0749-2081(99)80065-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silverman HJ, Luce JM, Lanken PN, et al; NHLBI Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network (ARDSNet). Recommendations for informed consent forms for critical care clinical trials. Crit Care Med. 2005. April;33(4):867-882. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000159201.08203.10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perrenoud B, Velonaki VS, Bodenmann P, Ramelet AS. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. October;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flory J, Emanuel E.. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004. Oct 6;292(13):1593-1601. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources