Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;21(1):33-39.
doi: 10.1177/1751143719832175. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

Critical care transfer in an English critical care network: Analysis of 1124 transfers delivered by an ad-hoc system

Scott Grier  1   2 , Graham Brant  3 , Timothy H Gould  3   4 , Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt  2   5 , Julian Thompson  2   5   6   7
Affiliations

Critical care transfer in an English critical care network: Analysis of 1124 transfers delivered by an ad-hoc system

Scott Grier et al. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Critical care transfers between hospitals are time critical high-risk episodes for unstable patients who often require urgent lifesaving intervention. This study aimed to establish the scale, nature and safety of current transfer practice in the South West Critical Care Network (SWCCN) in England.

Methods: The SWCCN database contains prospectively collected data in accordance with national guidelines. It was interrogated for all adult (>15 years of age) patients from January 2012 to November 2017.

Results: A total of 1124 inter-hospital transfers were recorded, with the majority (935, 83.2%) made for specialist treatment. The transferring team included a doctor in 998 (88.8%) and nurse in 935 (93.7%) transfers. In 204 (18.1%) transfers, delays occurred, with the commonest cause being availability of transport. Critical incidents occurred in 77 (6.9%).

Conclusions: This is the first published data on the transfer activity of a UK adult critical care network. It demonstrates that current ad-hoc provision is not meeting the longstanding expectations of national guidelines in terms of training, clinical experience and timeliness. The authors hope that this study may inform national conversation regarding the development of National Health Service commissioned inter-hospital transfer services for adult patients in England.

Keywords: Critical care; inter-hospital transfer; patient transfer; retrieval; transportation of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Types of transfer by time of day.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Whiteley S, Macartney I, Mark J, et al. Guidelines for the transport of the critically ill adult (3rd Edition 2011). Intensive Care Society 2011, www.ics.ac.uk/AsiCommon/Controls/BSA/Downloader.aspx?iDocumentStorageKey... (accessed 13 November 2018).
    1. Lovell MA, Mudaliar MY, Klineberg PL. Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: complications and difficulties. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001; 29: 400–405. - PubMed
    1. Droog JM, Smit M, Absalom AR, et al. Transferring the critically ill patient: are we there yet? Crit Care 2015; 19: 62–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ligtenberg JJM, Arnold LG, Stienstra Y, et al. Quality of interhospital transport of critically ill patients: a prospective audit. Crit Care 2005; 9: R446–R451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Droogh JM, Smit M, Hut J, et al. Inter-hospital transport of critically ill patients: expect surprise. Crit Care 2012; 16: R26. - PMC - PubMed