Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 1;16(2):124-128.
doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5115. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Breast Cancer Detection in Qatar: Evaluation of Mammography Image Quality Using A Standardized Assessment Tool

Affiliations

Breast Cancer Detection in Qatar: Evaluation of Mammography Image Quality Using A Standardized Assessment Tool

Anand K Narayan et al. Eur J Breast Health. .

Abstract

Objective: Compared with other countries in the Middle East, Qatar has one of the highest breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. Poor quality mammography images may be associated with advanced stage breast cancer, however there is limited information about the quality of breast imaging in Qatar. Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical image quality of mammography examinations performed at a tertiary care center in Doha, Qatar using a standardized assessment tool.

Materials and methods: Bilateral mammograms from consecutive patients from a tertiary care cancer center in Doha, Qatar were obtained. Proportions of examinations deemed adequate for interpretation were estimated. Standardized clinical image quality assessment form was utilized to evaluate image quality components. For each image, image quality components were given grades on a 1-5 scale (5-excellent, 4-good, 3-average, 2-fair, 1-poor). Mean scores with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each component.

Results: Consecutive sample of 132 patients was obtained representing 528 mammographic images. Overall, 99.2% of patients underwent examinations rated as acceptable for interpretation. Mean scores for each image quality component ranged from 4.045 to 5.000 (lowest score for inframammary fold). Image quality component scores were 93.0% excellent, 5.2% good, 1.1% average, 0.6% fair, and 0.1% poor.

Conclusion: Overall image quality at a tertiary care center in Doha, Qatar was acceptable for interpretation with minimal areas identified for improvement.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Middle East; Qatar; diagnostic imaging; mammography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standardized image quality assessment form

References

    1. Chouchane L, Boussen H, Sastry KS. Breast cancer in Arab populations: molecular characteristics and disease management implications. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:e417–424. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70165-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rauscher GH, Conant EF, Khan JA, Berbaum ML. Mammogram image quality as a potential contributor to disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis: an observational study. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-208. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18:805–835. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohsen H, Haddad P, Allam A, Hassan A. Patterns in place of cancer death in the State of Qatar: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e109615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109615. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NHS Breast Screening Programme. Guidance for breast screening mammographers. Public Health England (serial online) 2006. Apr, Available from: URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-quality-assu....

LinkOut - more resources