Inter-observer variability of radiologists for Cambridge classification of chronic pancreatitis using CT and MRCP: results from a large multi-center study
- PMID: 32285180
- PMCID: PMC7233445
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02521-7
Inter-observer variability of radiologists for Cambridge classification of chronic pancreatitis using CT and MRCP: results from a large multi-center study
Abstract
Purpose: Determine inter-observer variability among radiologists in assigning Cambridge Classification (CC) of chronic pancreatitis (CP) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).
Methods: Among 422 eligible subjects enrolled into the PROCEED study between 6/2017 and 8/2018, 39 were selected randomly for this study (chronic abdominal pain (n = 8; CC of 0), suspected CP (n = 22; CC of 0, 1 or 2) or definite CP (n = 9; CC of 3 or 4). Each imaging was scored by the local radiologist (LRs) and three of five central radiologists (CRs) at other consortium sites. The CRs were blinded to clinical data and site information of the participants. We compared the CC score assigned by the LR with the consensus CC score assigned by the CRs. The weighted kappa statistic (K) was used to estimate the inter-observer agreement.
Results: For the majority of subjects (34/39), the group assignment by LR agreed with the consensus composite CT/MRCP score by the CRs (concordance ranging from 75 to 89% depending on cohort group). There was moderate agreement (63% and 67% agreed, respectively) between CRs and LRs in both the CT score (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.56 [0.34, 0.78]; p-value = 0.57) and the MR score (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.49, 0.86]; p-value = 0.72). The composite CT/MR score showed moderate agreement (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.62 [0.43, 0.81]; p-value = 0.80).
Conclusion: There is a high degree of concordance among radiologists for assignment of CC using MRI and CT.
Keywords: Chronic pancreatitis; Computerized tomography; Inter-observer variability; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Figures


References
-
- Braganza JM, Lee SH, McCloy RF, McMahon MJ (2011) Chronic pancreatitis. The Lancet 377 (9772):1184–1197 - PubMed
-
- Majumder S, Chari ST (2016) Chronic pancreatitis. The Lancet 387 (10031):1957–1966 - PubMed
-
- Klöppel G, Detlefsen S, Feyerabend B (2004) Fibrosis of the pancreas: the initial tissue damage and the resulting pattern. Virchows Archiv 445 (1):1–8 - PubMed
-
- Sainani NI, Kadiyala V, Mortele K, Lee L, Suleiman S, Rosenblum J, Wang W, Banks PA, Conwell DL (2015) Evaluation of Qualitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pancreas 44 (8):1280–1289 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical