Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 May;45(5):1481-1487.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02521-7.

Inter-observer variability of radiologists for Cambridge classification of chronic pancreatitis using CT and MRCP: results from a large multi-center study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Inter-observer variability of radiologists for Cambridge classification of chronic pancreatitis using CT and MRCP: results from a large multi-center study

Temel Tirkes et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Determine inter-observer variability among radiologists in assigning Cambridge Classification (CC) of chronic pancreatitis (CP) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).

Methods: Among 422 eligible subjects enrolled into the PROCEED study between 6/2017 and 8/2018, 39 were selected randomly for this study (chronic abdominal pain (n = 8; CC of 0), suspected CP (n = 22; CC of 0, 1 or 2) or definite CP (n = 9; CC of 3 or 4). Each imaging was scored by the local radiologist (LRs) and three of five central radiologists (CRs) at other consortium sites. The CRs were blinded to clinical data and site information of the participants. We compared the CC score assigned by the LR with the consensus CC score assigned by the CRs. The weighted kappa statistic (K) was used to estimate the inter-observer agreement.

Results: For the majority of subjects (34/39), the group assignment by LR agreed with the consensus composite CT/MRCP score by the CRs (concordance ranging from 75 to 89% depending on cohort group). There was moderate agreement (63% and 67% agreed, respectively) between CRs and LRs in both the CT score (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.56 [0.34, 0.78]; p-value = 0.57) and the MR score (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.49, 0.86]; p-value = 0.72). The composite CT/MR score showed moderate agreement (weighted Kappa [95% CI] = 0.62 [0.43, 0.81]; p-value = 0.80).

Conclusion: There is a high degree of concordance among radiologists for assignment of CC using MRI and CT.

Keywords: Chronic pancreatitis; Computerized tomography; Inter-observer variability; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
2D thick-slab MRCP image (a) obtained 2 minutes after secretin administration demonstrates smooth contour of a prominent main pancreatic duct, which is tortuous (white arrow) in the region of pancreatic body. Note 2 abnormal branch ducts in the pancreatic head/neck (arrowheads). An axial image (b) from contrast-enhanced CT scan of the same patient demonstrates the prominent and slightly tortuous pancreatic duct (white arrows) in the body of pancreas. The apparent contour irregularity of PD from the tortuosity likely resulted in 2 of the 3 CRs categorizing the CT as grade 3 per CC with composite CT/MR score of 3, discordant from the corresponding composite CT/MR score of 1 by the LR.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
2D thick-slab MRCP image (a) obtained 2 minutes after secretin administration demonstrates smooth contour of a prominent main pancreatic duct, which is tortuous (white arrow) in the region of pancreatic body. Note 2 abnormal branch ducts in the pancreatic head/neck (arrowheads). An axial image (b) from contrast-enhanced CT scan of the same patient demonstrates the prominent and slightly tortuous pancreatic duct (white arrows) in the body of pancreas. The apparent contour irregularity of PD from the tortuosity likely resulted in 2 of the 3 CRs categorizing the CT as grade 3 per CC with composite CT/MR score of 3, discordant from the corresponding composite CT/MR score of 1 by the LR.

References

    1. Conwell DL, Lee LS, Yadav D, Longnecker DS, Miller FH, Mortele KJ, Levy MJ, Kwon R, Lieb JG, Stevens T (2014) American Pancreatic Association practice guidelines in chronic pancreatitis: evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines. Pancreas 43 (8):1143–1162 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braganza JM, Lee SH, McCloy RF, McMahon MJ (2011) Chronic pancreatitis. The Lancet 377 (9772):1184–1197 - PubMed
    1. Majumder S, Chari ST (2016) Chronic pancreatitis. The Lancet 387 (10031):1957–1966 - PubMed
    1. Klöppel G, Detlefsen S, Feyerabend B (2004) Fibrosis of the pancreas: the initial tissue damage and the resulting pattern. Virchows Archiv 445 (1):1–8 - PubMed
    1. Sainani NI, Kadiyala V, Mortele K, Lee L, Suleiman S, Rosenblum J, Wang W, Banks PA, Conwell DL (2015) Evaluation of Qualitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pancreas 44 (8):1280–1289 - PubMed

Publication types