Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;120(1):1-12.
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.04.013. Epub 2008 Jun 24.

Performance of spring-calving beef suckler cows and their progeny to slaughter on intensive and extensive grassland management systems

M J Drennan  1 , M McGee  1
Affiliations

Performance of spring-calving beef suckler cows and their progeny to slaughter on intensive and extensive grassland management systems

M J Drennan et al. Livest Sci. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

The performance of rotationally grazed beef suckler cows and their progeny to slaughter on two lowland grassland management systems differing in stocking rate (SR) and fertiliser nitrogen (N) level was compared over eight years. The two Systems were 1) Intensive (INT): SR of 0.56 (bull production) or 0.71 (steer production) ha cow- 1 unit, 211 kg fertiliser N ha- 1, two silage harvests, and 2) Extensive (EXT): SR of 0.69 (bull production) or 0.88 (steer production) ha cow- 1 unit, 97 kg fertiliser N ha- 1 and one staggered silage harvest. A cow unit was defined as a cow plus progeny to slaughter. On the silage harvesting area, the mean application rate for fertiliser N was 110 and 80 kg ha- 1 for first and second harvests, respectively. Herbage dry matter digestibility both pre- and post-grazing was similar (P > 0.05) for the two systems, whereas herbage crude protein concentrations were generally significantly lower for the EXT than the INT system. There was no difference (P > 0.05) between the Systems in cow live weight, body condition score or their changes or in calf live weight gain from birth to weaning. Post-weaning, live weight gain, slaughter weight, carcass weight, kill-out proportion, estimated carcass gain, carcass conformation score or carcass fat score did not differ (P > 0.05) between the systems for heifer, steer or bull progeny. It can be concluded that similar animal performance levels can be expected in an extensive grassland-based suckler calf-to-beef system compatible with the EU, Rural Environmental Protection Scheme as that attained in a more intensive System comprising of both a moderately high SR (~ 1.25 higher) and fertiliser N application (~ 2.1 higher).

Keywords: Beef suckler cow; Cattle; Extensification; Grassland management systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams D.C., Nielsen M.K., Schacht W.H., Clarke R.T. Designing and conducting experiments for range beef cows. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci. 2000 1999.
    1. Anderson R.V., Rasby R.J., Klopfenstein T.J., Clarke R.T. An evaluation of production and economic efficiency of two beef systems from calving to slaughter. J. Anim. Sci. 2005;83:694–704. - PubMed
    1. Audic C., Hardy A., Pelletier P. Extensification of grazed pastures in French suckling cow systems. Grassl. Sci. Europe. 2002;7:1008–1009.
    1. Baumont R., Traclet M., Le Morvan A., Egal D., Jouven M., D'Hour P. Diet quality and intake during the grazing season in beef cows on permanent pasture. Grassl. Sci. Europe. 2006;11:496–498.
    1. Clarke A.M., Black A.D., Drennan M.J., McGee M., Berry D.P., Kenny D.A. Proc. Agric. Res. Forum 2008, Tullamore, Teagasc, 12th and 13th March. 2008. Estimation of pasture and grass silage intake by three genotypes of beef cattle; p. 90.

LinkOut - more resources