Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 10;8(2):29.
doi: 10.3390/toxics8020029.

Effect of 10 UV Filters on the Brine Shrimp Artemia salina and the Marine Microalga Tetraselmis sp

Affiliations

Effect of 10 UV Filters on the Brine Shrimp Artemia salina and the Marine Microalga Tetraselmis sp

Evane Thorel et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

The presence of pharmaceutical and personal care product (PPCP) residues in the aquatic environment is an emerging issue due to their uncontrolled release through gray water, and accumulation in the environment that may affect living organisms, ecosystems and public health. The aim of this study is to assess the toxicity of benzophenone-3 (BP-3), bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine (BEMT), butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BM), methylene bis-benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol (MBBT), 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (ES), diethylaminohydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate (DHHB), diethylhexyl butamido triazone (DBT), ethylhexyl triazone (ET), homosalate (HS) and octocrylene (OC) on marine organisms from two major trophic levels, including autotrophs (Tetraselmis sp.) and heterotrophs (Artemia salina). In general, results showed that both HS and OC were the most toxic UV filters for our tested species, followed by a significant effect of BM on Artemia salina due to BM-but only at high concentrations (1 mg/L). ES, BP3 and DHHB affected the metabolic activity of the microalgae at 100 µg/L. BEMT, DBT, ET, MBBT had no effect on the tested organisms, even at high concentrations (2 mg/L). OC toxicity represents a risk for those species, since concentrations used in this study are 15-90 times greater than those reported in occurrence studies for aquatic environments. For the first time in the literature, we report HS toxicity on a microalgae species at concentrations complementing those found in aquatic environments. These preliminary results could represent a risk in the future if concentrations of OC and HS continue to increase.

Keywords: Artemia salina; UV-filters; marine environment; marine microalgae; toxicity tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mortality rate of A. salina exposed to the 10 UV filters at 6 concentrations. Boxes delineate the minimal and maximal values and the vertical line is the median of six replicates. Significance levels relative to control determined by ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s multiple comparison test: *** p < 0.001. Results were not significant unless otherwise stated. For BM, HS and OC, the LC50 is reported on the figure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative (A) growth rate, (B) granularity, (C) cell volume, (D) fluorescence and (E) metabolic activity of exposed Tetraselmis compared to control, set to 100%. The boxes delineate the minimal and maximal values. The vertical line in the boxes is at mean. Significance levels relative to negative control determined by ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s multiple comparison test: *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. Results were not significant unless otherwise stated. N/A: not applicable, the data could not be obtained due to extensive cell death.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azoury S.C., Lange J.R. Epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, and early detection of melanoma. Surg. Clin. 2014;94:945–962. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.07.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waldman R.A., Grant-Kels J.M. The role of sunscreen in the prevention of cutaneous melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019;80:574–576.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sánchez-Quiles D., Tovar-Sánchez A. Are sunscreens a new environmental risk associated with coastal tourism? Environ. Int. 2015;83:158–170. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pirotta G. The encyclopedia of allowed sunfilters in the world. Skin Care—Househ. Pers. Care Today. 2016;11:19–21.
    1. Tsui M.M.P., Leung H.W., Wai T.-C., Yamashita N., Taniyasu S., Liu W., Lam P.K.S., Murphy M.B. Occurrence, distribution and ecological risk assessment of multiple classes of UV filters in surface waters from different countries. Water Res. 2014;67:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.013. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources