Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 10;9(4):491.
doi: 10.3390/plants9040491.

Transcription Factors in Plant Stress Responses: Challenges and Potential for Sugarcane Improvement

Affiliations
Review

Transcription Factors in Plant Stress Responses: Challenges and Potential for Sugarcane Improvement

Talha Javed et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Increasing vulnerability of crops to a wide range of abiotic and biotic stresses can have a marked influence on the growth and yield of major crops, especially sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). In response to various stresses, plants have evolved a variety of complex defense systems of signal perception and transduction networks. Transcription factors (TFs) that are activated by different pathways of signal transduction and can directly or indirectly combine with cis-acting elements to modulate the transcription efficiency of target genes, which play key regulators for crop genetic improvement. Over the past decade, significant progresses have been made in deciphering the role of plant TFs as key regulators of environmental responses in particular important cereal crops; however, a limited amount of studies have focused on sugarcane. This review summarizes the potential functions of major TF families, such as WRKY, NAC, MYB and AP2/ERF, in regulating gene expression in the response of plants to abiotic and biotic stresses, which provides important clues for the engineering of stress-tolerant cultivars in sugarcane.

Keywords: Saccharum spp.; biotic and abiotic stresses; gene regulation; genetic improvement; transcription factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bhadouria R., Singh R., Singh V.K., Borthakur A., Ahamad A., Kumar G., Singh P. Climate Change and Agricultural Ecosystems. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2019. Agriculture in the era of climate change: Consequences and effects; pp. 1–23.
    1. Baillo E.H., Kimotho R.N., Zhang Z., Xu P. Transcription factors associated with abiotic and biotic stress tolerance and their potential for crops improvement. Genes. 2019;10:771. doi: 10.3390/genes10100771. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali A., Khan M., Sharif R., Mujtaba M., Gao S.-J. Sugarcane Omics: An update on the current status of research and crop improvement. Plants. 2019;8:344. doi: 10.3390/plants8090344. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fraire-Velázquez S., Rodríguez-Guerra R., Sánchez-Calderón L. Abiotic Stress Response in Plants—Physiological, Biochemical and Genetic Perspectives. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2011. Abiotic and biotic stress response crosstalk in plants; pp. 3–26.
    1. Gonzalez D.H. Plant Transcription Factors. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2016. Introduction to transcription factor structure and function; pp. 3–11.