Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;40(4):181-193.
doi: 10.1002/cac2.12024. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

Ki-67 index, progesterone receptor expression, histologic grade and tumor size in predicting breast cancer recurrence risk: A consecutive cohort study

Affiliations

Ki-67 index, progesterone receptor expression, histologic grade and tumor size in predicting breast cancer recurrence risk: A consecutive cohort study

Yanna Zhang et al. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay has been recommended by major guidelines for treatment decision in hormone receptor (HR)-positive early breast cancer (EBC). However, the genomic assay is not accessible and affordable worldwide. Alternatively, an increasing number of studies have shown that traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) can partially or even completely replace the role of the 21-gene genomic assay. Here, we developed and validated a predictive model (IHC3 model) combining the Ki-67 index, progesterone receptor (PR) expression, histologic grade, and tumor size to predict the recurrence risk of HR-positive EBC.

Methods: The data from 389 patients (development set) with HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, lymph node non-metastasized invasive breast cancer were used to construct the IHC3 model based on the Surexam® 21-gene RS and the TAILORx clinical trial criteria. An additional 146 patients with the same characteristics constituted the validation set. The predictive accuracy of the IHC3 model was compared with that of Orucevic et al.'s nomogram. Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) was analyzed in the IHC3 predictive low-recurrence risk (pLR) group and the predictive high-recurrence risk (pHR) group. The Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and log-rank test were used for analysis.

Results: The pLR and pHR group could be easily stratified using the decision tree model without network dependence. The accuracies of the IHC3 model were 86.1% in the development set and 87.7% in the validation set. The predictive accuracy of the IHC3 model and Orucevic et al.'s nomogram for the whole cohort was 86.5% and 86.9%, respectively. After a 52-month of median follow-up, a significant difference was found in IDFS between of the IHC3 pLR and the pHR groups (P = 0.001) but not in the IDFS between the low- and high-recurrence risk groups according to the Surexam® 21-gene RS and the TAILORx clinical trial criteria (P = 0.556) or 21-gene binary RS group (P = 0.511).

Conclusions: The proposed IHC3 model could reliably predict low and high recurrence risks in most HR-positive EBC patients. This easy-to-use predictive model may be a reliable replacement for the 21-gene genomic assay in patients with EBC who have no access to or cannot afford the 21-gene genomic assay.

Keywords: 21-gene genomic assay; Ki-67; breast cancer; histologic grade; progesterone receptor; recurrence score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The decision tree for IHC3 model. Clinical risk was defined as low if the tumor diameter was 3 cm or smaller with a low histologic grade, 2 cm or smaller with an intermediate grade, or 1 cm or smaller with a high grade. If the low‐risk criteria were not met, the clinical risk was defined as high. Abbreviations: IHC immunohistochemistry; HR hormone receptor; HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PR progesterone receptor
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Kaplan–Meier estimates of invasive disease‐free survival curves for patients in IHC3 pLR and pHR groups. a all patients; b patients older than 50 years of age; c patients 50 years of age or younger. Abbreviations: pLR predictive low‐recurrence risk; pHR predictive high‐recurrence risk
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kaplan–Meier estimates of invasive disease‐free survival for patients in the low recurrence risk group and high recurrence group according to Surexam® 21‐gene RS and TAILORx clinical trial criteria. a all patients; b patients older than 50 years of age; c patients 50 years of age or younger. Abbreviations: RS recurrence score
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Kaplan–Meier estimates of invasive disease‐free survival curves for patients with an RS (Surexam® 21‐gene) of 0‐25 (low risk) and patients with an RS (Surexam® 21‐gene) of 26‐100 (high risk). a all patients; b patients older than 50 years of age; c patients 50 years of age or younger. Abbreviations: RS recurrence score

References

    1. Harbeck N, Gnant M. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2017;389(10074):1134‐50. - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424. - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7‐30. - PubMed
    1. Kamal AH, Loprinzi CL, Reynolds C, Dueck AC, Geiger XJ, Ingle JN, et al. Breast medical oncologists' use of standard prognostic factors to predict a 21‐gene recurrence score. Oncologist. 2011;16(10):1359‐66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goetz MP, Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Allison KH, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 3.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(2):118‐26. - PubMed

Publication types