A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research
- PMID: 32292186
- PMCID: PMC7055404
- DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7120
A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research
Abstract
Attributes of rigor and quality and suggested best practices for qualitative research design as they relate to the steps of designing, conducting, and reporting qualitative research in health professions educational scholarship are presented. A research question must be clear and focused and supported by a strong conceptual framework, both of which contribute to the selection of appropriate research methods that enhance trustworthiness and minimize researcher bias inherent in qualitative methodologies. Qualitative data collection and analyses are often modified through an iterative approach to answering the research question. Researcher reflexivity, essentially a researcher's insight into their own biases and rationale for decision-making as the study progresses, is critical to rigor. This article reviews common standards of rigor, quality scholarship criteria, and best practices for qualitative research from design through dissemination.
Keywords: best practices; qualitative research design; quality; standards of rigor.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.
Figures
References
-
- Denzin Norman, Lincoln YS. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2011.
-
- Santiago-Delefosse M, Gavin A, Bruchez C, Roux P, Stephen SL. Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users. Soc Sci Med. 2016;148:142-51. - PubMed
-
- O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med . 2014;89(9):1245-1251. - PubMed
-
- Morse JM. Qualitative Health Research: Challenges for the 21st Century. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(1):116-129. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
