Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;84(1):7120.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe7120.

A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research

Affiliations
Review

A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research

Jessica L Johnson et al. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Attributes of rigor and quality and suggested best practices for qualitative research design as they relate to the steps of designing, conducting, and reporting qualitative research in health professions educational scholarship are presented. A research question must be clear and focused and supported by a strong conceptual framework, both of which contribute to the selection of appropriate research methods that enhance trustworthiness and minimize researcher bias inherent in qualitative methodologies. Qualitative data collection and analyses are often modified through an iterative approach to answering the research question. Researcher reflexivity, essentially a researcher's insight into their own biases and rationale for decision-making as the study progresses, is critical to rigor. This article reviews common standards of rigor, quality scholarship criteria, and best practices for qualitative research from design through dissemination.

Keywords: best practices; qualitative research design; quality; standards of rigor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Adaptation of Ravitch and Carl’s Components of a Conceptual Framework

References

    1. Denzin Norman, Lincoln YS. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2011.
    1. Anderson C. Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ . 2010; 74(8):Article 141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santiago-Delefosse M, Gavin A, Bruchez C, Roux P, Stephen SL. Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users. Soc Sci Med. 2016;148:142-51. - PubMed
    1. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med . 2014;89(9):1245-1251. - PubMed
    1. Morse JM. Qualitative Health Research: Challenges for the 21st Century. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(1):116-129. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources