Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline
- PMID: 32293205
- PMCID: PMC7159433
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0251ST
Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, finding nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. There are no universally accepted measures to determine if each diagnostic criterion has been satisfied; therefore, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is never fully secure.Methods: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best available evidence. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations for or against various diagnostic tests were formulated and graded after the expert panel weighed desirable and undesirable consequences, certainty of estimates, feasibility, and acceptability.Results: The clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses were summarized. On the basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline serum calcium testing, 13 conditional recommendations, and 1 best practice statement. All evidence was very low quality.Conclusions: The panel used systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patients with suspected or known sarcoidosis. The evidence and recommendations should be revisited as new evidence becomes available.
Keywords: cardiac sarcoidosis; endobronchial ultrasound biopsy; granuloma; pulmonary hypertension; rare lung disease.
Figures



Comment in
-
Confirmatory Tissue Sampling in Clinical Stage I Sarcoidosis.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov 1;202(9):1321-1322. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1591LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32678666 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Tissue Sampling in Suspected Sarcoidosis: Can We Avoid Mediastinal Procedures?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov 1;202(9):1321. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1501LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32678668 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis: A Forgotten Tool?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov 1;202(9):1320-1321. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1178LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32678670 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to P. B. et al., to Fahim and Rosewarne, and to Reich.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov 1;202(9):1322-1324. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2328LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32678671 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Hunninghake GW, Costabel U, Ando M, Baughman R, Cordier JF, du Bois R, et al. ATS/ERS/WASOG statement on sarcoidosis: American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/World Association of Sarcoidosis and other Granulomatous Disorders. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 1999;16:149–173. - PubMed
-
- Spiteri MA, Matthey F, Gordon T, Carstairs LS, James DG. Lupus pernio: a clinico-radiological study of thirty-five cases. Br J Dermatol. 1985;112:315–322. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical