Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study
- PMID: 32294530
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.001
Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study
Abstract
Background: Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated clinical benefit in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Combining immunotherapies targeting PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has shown evidence of additive activity in several tumor types. This phase III study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody) versus standard of care (SoC) in R/M HNSCC patients.
Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 : 1 : 1 durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [q2w]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (durvalumab 20 mg/kg q4w plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w × 4, then durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), or SoC (cetuximab, a taxane, methotrexate, or a fluoropyrimidine). The primary end points were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab versus SoC, and OS for durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and duration of response.
Results: Patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n = 240), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 247), or SoC (n = 249). No statistically significant improvements in OS were observed for durvalumab versus SoC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-1.08; P = 0.20] or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85-1.26; P = 0.76). The 12-month survival rates (95% CI) were 37.0% (30.9-43.1), 30.4% (24.7-36.3), and 30.5% (24.7-36.4) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were consistent with previous reports. The most common trAEs (any grade) were hypothyroidism for durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (11.4% and 12.2%, respectively), and anemia (17.5%) for SoC. Grade ≥3 trAE rates were 10.1%, 16.3%, and 24.2% for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively.
Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in OS for durvalumab or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. However, higher survival rates at 12 to 24 months and response rates demonstrate clinical activity for durvalumab.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02369874.
Keywords: durvalumab; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; immunotherapy; metastatic; randomized clinical trial; tremelimumab.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures AstraZeneca contributed to the study drug, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of this manuscript. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and full responsibility for the decision to submit. RLF: consulting or advisory role—Aduro Biotech, Inc.; Amgen; AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bain Capital Life Sciences; Bristol-Myers Squibb; EMD Serono; GlaxoSmithKline; Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc; Lilly; MacroGenics; Merck; Nanobiotix; Numab Therapeutics AG; Oncorus, Inc.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Pfizer; PPD (Benitec, Immunicum); Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Tesaro; Torque Therapeutics Inc.; TTMS. Research funding—AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck; Tesaro; TTMS; VentiRx. RH: consulting or advisory role—AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Genentech; Bayer; Eisai; Merck; Pfizer; AstraZeneca; EMD Serono; Nanobiotix; GlaxoSmithKline. Research funding—AstraZeneca (Inst); Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); Merck (Inst); Pfizer (Inst); Genentech (Inst). CE: consulting or advisory role—AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Innate Pharma; MSD Oncology. MT: honoraria—Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Merck Serono; Takeda. Consulting or advisory role—Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Ono Pharmaceutical; Pfizer. Research funding—AstraZeneca (Inst); Bayer (Inst); Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst); Eisai (Inst); Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst); NanoCarrier (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst); Pfizer (Inst). MD: no relationships to disclose. T-EC: consulting or advisory role—Amgen; Astellas Pharma; AstraZeneca; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; GlaxoSmithKline/Novartis; Janssen; Lilly; Merck Serono; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche; Sanofi. Travel, accommodations, expenses—A&D Pharma; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Boehringer Ingelheim; Ipsen; Merck; Pfizer; Sanofi; Servier. JF: leadership—Glycotope GmbH. Honoraria—AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb. PMC: consulting or advisory role—Abbvie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; LEO Pharma; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Vifor Pharma. Speakers' Bureau—AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme. Research funding—AstraZeneca. Patents, royalties, other intellectual property —NIH/NCI. RM: consulting or advisory role—AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck KGaA; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Nanobiotix; Roche. Speakers' Bureau—Merck KGaA. Travel, accommodations, expenses—Merck KGaA. Research funding: Merck KGaA. SK: no relationships to disclose. LZ: no relationships to disclose. AD: consulting or advisory role—Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck KGaA. JS: employed by AstraZeneca. HM: employed by AstraZeneca. SW: employed by AstraZeneca. NM: employed by AstraZeneca. LL: consulting or advisory role—Amgen; AstraZeneca; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Debiopharm Group; Eisai; Merck Serono; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Roche; SOBI. Research funding—Amgen (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst); Eisai (Inst); Merck Serono (Inst); MSD (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Roche (Inst). Travel, accommodations, expenses—Amgen; Bayer; Debiopharm Group; Merck Serono; SOBI. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
The EAGLE study: two is not always better than one.Ann Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(7):830-831. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.474. Epub 2020 May 7. Ann Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32387452 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials