Salvage treatment for refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a 10-year single-center experience
- PMID: 32294670
- PMCID: PMC7134553
- DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1566
Salvage treatment for refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a 10-year single-center experience
Erratum in
-
Erratum for: Salvage treatment for refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a 10-year single-center experience.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020;75:e1566err. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1566err. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020. PMID: 32901670 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Objectives: The outcomes of refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in developing countries are underreported, even though the similar classic regimens are widely used.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparison of "MEC" (mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine) and "FLAG-IDA" (fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and filgrastim) in adults with first relapse or refractory AML.
Results: In total, 60 patients were included, of which 28 patients received MEC and 32 received FLAG-IDA. A complete response (CR) rate of 48.3% was observed. Of the included patients, 16 (27%) died before undergoing bone marrow assessment. No statiscally significant difference in CR rate was found between the two protocols (p=0.447). The median survival in the total cohort was 4 months, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of 9.7%. In a multivariable model including age, fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) status, and stem-cell transplantation (SCT), only the last two indicators remained significant: FLT3-ITD mutation (hazard ratio [HR]=4.6, p<0.001) and SCT (HR=0.43, p=0.01).
Conclusion: In our analysis, there were no significant differences between the chosen regimens. High rates of early toxicity were found, emphasizing the role of supportive care and judicious selection of patients who are eligible for intensive salvage therapy in this setting. The FLT3-ITD mutation and SCT remained significant factors for survival in our study, in line with the results of previous studies.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported.
Figures
References
-
- Song X, Peng Y, Wang X, Chen Y, Jin L, Yang T, et al. Incidence, Survival, and Risk Factors for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Not Otherwise Specified and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Recurrent Genetic Abnormalities: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database, 2001-2013. Acta Haematol. 2018;139((2)):115–27. doi: 10.1159/000486228. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Benicio MTL, Ribeiro AFT, Américo AD, Furtado FM, Glória AB, Lima AS, et al. Evaluation of the European LeukemiaNet recommendations for predicting outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC): A Brazilian experience. Leuk Res. 2017;60:109–14. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
