Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 15;17(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00948-1.

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from a food service industry perspective: a mixed methods systematic review

Affiliations

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from a food service industry perspective: a mixed methods systematic review

Claire Kerins et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Eating outside the home contributes to poor dietary habits worldwide and is associated with increased body fat and weight gain. Evidence shows menu labelling is effective in promoting healthier food choices; however, implementation issues have arisen. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from the perspective of the food service industry.

Methods: Peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched using databases, specialised search engines and public health organisation websites. Screening reference lists, citation chaining and contacting authors of all included studies were undertaken. Primary research studies relevant to direct supply-side stakeholders were eligible for inclusion. There were no restrictions on menu labelling scheme or format, study methods, publication year or language. At least two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal. The results were synthesised using the 'best fit' framework synthesis approach, with reference to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results: Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria, with the majority rated as average quality (n = 10). The most frequently cited barriers were coded to the CFIR constructs 'Consumer Needs & Resources' (e.g. lack of customer demand for/interest in menu labelling, risk of overwhelmed/confused customers) and 'Compatibility' with organisation work processes (e.g. lack of standardised recipes, limited space on menus). Frequently cited facilitators were coded to the CFIR constructs 'Relative Advantage' of menu labelling (e.g. improved business image/reputation) and 'Consumer Needs & Resources' (e.g. customer demand for/interest in menu labelling, providing nutrition information to customers). An adapted framework consisting of a priori and new constructs was developed, which illustrates the relationships between domains.

Conclusion: This review generates an adapted CFIR framework for understanding implementation of menu labelling interventions. It highlights that implementation is influenced by multiple interdependent factors, particularly related to the external and internal context of food businesses, and features of the menu labelling intervention. The findings can be used by researchers and practitioners to develop or select strategies to address barriers that impede implementation and to leverage facilitators that assist with implementation effort.

Trial registration: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017083306.

Keywords: Barriers; Best fit framework synthesis; Consolidated framework for implementation research; Facilitators; Implementation; Menu labelling; Mixed methods; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of data analysis and synthesis process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection process
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adapted ‘Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research’ of the barriers to implementing menu labelling interventions across multiple levels. Outer Setting = external environment to food service businesses; Organisation Characteristics = internal environment of food service businesses; Intervention Characteristics = features of menu labelling intervention; Individual Characteristics = characteristics of individuals within food service businesses; Process = process of implementing menu labelling intervention
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Adapted ‘Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research’ of the facilitators to implementing menu labelling interventions across multiple levels. Outer Setting = external environment to food service businesses; Organisation Characteristics = internal environment of food service businesses; Intervention Characteristics = features of menu labelling intervention; Individual Characteristics = characteristics of individuals within food service businesses; Process = process of implementing menu labelling intervention

References

    1. Adams ML, Grandpre J, Katz DL, Shenson D. The impact of key modifiable risk factors on leading chronic conditions. Prev Med. 2019;120:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khandelwal S, Kurpad A, Narayan K. Global non-communicable diseases—the nutrition conundrum. Front Public Health. 2018;6:9. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onufrak SJ, Zaganjor H, Pan L, Lee-Kwan SH, Park S, Harris DM. Foods and beverages obtained at worksites in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119:999–1008. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orfanos P, Naska A, Trichopoulou A, Grioni S, Boer JM, van Bakel MM, et al. Eating out of home: energy, macro- and micronutrient intakes in 10 European countries. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(Suppl 4):S239–S262. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.84. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Todd JE. Changes in consumption of food away from home and intakes of energy and other nutrients among US working-age adults, 2005–2014. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20:3238–3246. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002403. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types