Development of a risk scoring system for predicting acute kidney injury after minimally invasive partial and radical nephrectomy: a retrospective study
- PMID: 32297056
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07545-0
Development of a risk scoring system for predicting acute kidney injury after minimally invasive partial and radical nephrectomy: a retrospective study
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury after partial or radical nephrectomy remains an unsolved problem even when using minimally invasive techniques. We aimed to identify risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after minimally invasive nephrectomy and to develop a clinical risk scoring system.
Methods: Medical records of 1762 patients who underwent minimally invasive laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial (n = 1009) or radical (n = 753) nephrectomy from December 2005 to November 2018 were reviewed. Candidate risk factors were screened using univariate analysis and ranked using linear discriminant analysis; top ranking factors were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model. Then, the final clinical scoring system was created based on the estimated odds ratios.
Results: The incidence of acute kidney injury after partial or radical nephrectomy was 20.3 and 61.6%, respectively. Risk factors incorporated into the scoring system included: size of the parenchymal mass removed (3 < parenchymal mass ≤ 4 cm, 1 point; 4 < parenchymal mass ≤ 6 cm, 3 points; parenchymal mass > 6 cm, 5 points), male sex (2 points), diabetes mellitus (1 point), warm ischemia time ≥ 25 min (1 point), and immediate postoperative neutrophil count ≥ 12,000 µl-1 (1 point) in patients with partial nephrectomy, and sex (male, 10 points; female, 7 points) in patients with radical nephrectomy. For risk scores of 0-4, 5-6, 7, 8-9, and 10 points, the probabilities of acute kidney injury were approximately 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80%, respectively. The predictive accuracy of the scoring system was 0.827 (95% CI 0.789-0.865).
Conclusion: Our risk scoring system could help clinicians identify those at risk of acute kidney injury after minimally invasive partial or radical nephrectomy, thereby optimizing postoperative management.
Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Nephrectomy; Risk scoring.
References
-
- Bragayrac LA, Abbotoy D, Attwood K, Darwiche F, Hoffmeyer J, Kauffman EC, Schwaab T (2016) Outcomes of minimal invasive vs open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of locally advanced renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 30(8):871–876 - DOI
-
- Xia L, Wang X, Xu T, Guzzo TJ (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 31(9):893–909 - DOI
-
- Golombos DM, Chughtai B, Trinh QD, Thomas D, Mao J, Te A, O'Malley P, Scherr DS, Del Pizzo J, Hu JC, Sedrakyan A (2017) Minimally invasive vs open nephrectomy in the modern era: does approach matter? World J Urol 35(10):1557–1568 - DOI
-
- Schmid M, Abd-El-Barr AE, Gandaglia G, Sood A, Olugbade K Jr, Ruhotina N, Sammon JD, Varda B, Chang SL, Kibel AS, Chun FK, Menon M, Fisch M, Trinh QD (2014) Predictors of 30-day acute kidney injury following radical and partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 32(8):1259–1266 - DOI
-
- Schmid M, Krishna N, Ravi P, Meyer CP, Becker A, Dalela D, Sood A, Chun FK, Kibel AS, Menon M, Fisch M, Trinh QD, Sun M (2016) Trends of acute kidney injury after radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 34(7):293.e291–293.e210 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources