The Utility of Intraoperative Lateral Spread Recording in Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 32297629
- DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa069
The Utility of Intraoperative Lateral Spread Recording in Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the surgical treatment of choice for hemifacial spasm (HFS). During MVD, monitoring of the abnormal lateral spread response (LSR), an evoked response to facial nerve stimulation, has been traditionally used to monitor adequacy of cranial nerve (CN) VII decompression.
Objective: To assess the utility of LSR monitoring in predicting spasm-free status after MVD postoperatively.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant publications. We included studies reporting on intraoperative LSR monitoring during MVD for HFS and spasm-free status following the procedure. Sensitivity of LSR, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive predictive value were calculated.
Results: From 148 studies, 26 studies with 7479 patients were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. The final intraoperative LSR status predicted the clinical outcome of MVD with the following specificities and sensitivities: 89% (0.83- 0.93) and 40% (0.30- 0.51) at discharge, 90% (0.84-0.94) and 41% (0.29-0.53) at 3 mo, 89% (0.83-0.93) and 40% (0.30-0.51) at 1 yr. When LSR persisted after MVD, the probability (95% CI) for HFS persistence was 47.8% (0.33-0.63) at discharge, 40.8% (0.23-0.61) at 3 mo, and 24.4% (0.13-0.41) at 1 yr. However, when LSR resolved, the probability for HFS persistence was 7.3% at discharge, 4.2% at 3 mo, and 4.0% at 1 yr.
Conclusion: Intraoperative LSR monitoring has high specificity but modest sensitivity in predicting the spasm-free status following MVD. Persistence of LSR carries high risk for immediate and long-term facial spasm persistence. Therefore, adequacy of decompression should be thoroughly investigated before closing in cases where intraoperative LSR persists.
Keywords: Abnormal muscle response; Hemifacial spasm; Intraoperative monitoring; Lateral spreading response; Meta-analysis; Microvascular decompression.
Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.
Comment in
-
Letter: The Utility of Intraoperative Lateral Spread Recording in Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosurgery. 2020 Oct 15;87(5):E596-E597. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa339. Neurosurgery. 2020. PMID: 32761204 No abstract available.
-
In Reply: The Utility of Intraoperative Lateral Spread Recording in Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosurgery. 2020 Oct 15;87(5):E598-E599. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa345. Neurosurgery. 2020. PMID: 32761240 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: can intraoperative lateral spread response monitoring improve surgical efficacy?J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;128(3):885-890. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS162148. Epub 2017 May 12. J Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 28498061
-
Prognostic ability of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm to predict lateral spread response outcome.J Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;126(2):391-396. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS151782. Epub 2016 Apr 22. J Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 27104851
-
Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: evaluating outcome prognosticators including the value of intraoperative lateral spread response monitoring and clinical characteristics in 293 patients.J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;28(1):56-66. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182051300. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21221005
-
Usefulness of intraoperative monitoring in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;36(3):346-357. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2022.2049701. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Br J Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 35313771
-
Intra-operative neurophysiology during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;123(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Dec 1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22136736 Review.
Cited by
-
Indication for a skull base approach in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Dec;164(12):3235-3246. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05397-2. Epub 2022 Oct 27. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022. PMID: 36289112
-
Predicting outcome of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression with intraoperative monitoring: A systematic review.Heliyon. 2021 Feb 2;7(2):e06115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06115. eCollection 2021 Feb. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 33644443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Determining prognostic factors in the treatment of primary hemifacial spasm: Clinical outcomes and complications. A literature review.World Neurosurg X. 2024 Sep 28;25:100406. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100406. eCollection 2025 Jan. World Neurosurg X. 2024. PMID: 39411270 Free PMC article.
-
A novel 3D multimodal fusion imaging surgical guidance in microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm.Head Face Med. 2024 Oct 10;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00442-0. Head Face Med. 2024. PMID: 39390456 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in Intraoperative Neurophysiology During Microvascular Decompression Surgery for Hemifacial Spasm.J Clin Neurol. 2022 Jul;18(4):410-420. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.410. J Clin Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35796266 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources