Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):315.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05099-4.

Using patient-reported measures to drive change in healthcare: the experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy

Sabina De Rosis  1 , Domenico Cerasuolo  2 , Sabina Nuti  2
Affiliations

Using patient-reported measures to drive change in healthcare: the experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy

Sabina De Rosis et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The use of Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) has great potential in healthcare service improvement, but a limited use. This paper presents an empirical case of PREMs innovation in Italy, to foster patient data use up to the ward level, by keeping strengths and addressing weaknesses of previous PREMs survey experiences. The paper reports key lessons learned in this ongoing experience of action research, directly involving practitioners.

Methods: The aim of this paper is to present the results of an ongoing action research, encompassing the innovation of PREMs collection, reporting and use, currently adopted by 21 hospitals of two Italian regions. The continuous and systematic PREMs collection has been implemented between 2017 and 2019 and includes: a continuous web-based administration, using web-services; an augmented and positive questionnaire matching standard closed-ended questions with narrative sections; the inclusion and benchmarking of patient data within a shared performance evaluation system; public disclosure of aggregated anonymized data; a multi-level and real-time web-platform for reporting PREMs to professionals. The action research was carried out with practitioners in a real-life and complex context. The authors used multiple data sources and methods: observations, feedback of practitioners, collected during several workshops and meetings, and analysis of preliminary data on the survey implementation.

Results: A continuous and systematic PREMs observatory was developed and adopted in two Italian regions. PREMs participation and response rates tend to increase over time, reaching stable percentages after the first months. Narrative feedback provide a 'positive narration' of episodes and behaviours that made the difference to patients and can inform quality improvement actions. Real-time reporting of quantitative and qualitative data is enabling a gratifying process of service improvement and people management at all the hospitals' levels.

Conclusions: The PREMs presented in this paper has been recognized by healthcare professionals and managers as a strategic and positive tool for improving an actual use of PREMs at system and ward levels, by measuring and highlighting positive deviances, such as compassionate behaviours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

None
Fig. 1 A conceptual framework of PREMs data use at the different levels of the healthcare system and organization
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–231. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coulter A. Can patients assess the quality of health care?: Patients' surveys should ask about real experiences of medical care. BMJ: Br Med J. 2006;333(7557):1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7557.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nuti S, De Rosis S, Bonciani M, Murante AM. Rethinking healthcare performance evaluation systems towards the people-Centredness approach: their pathways, their experience, their evaluation. HealthcPap. 2017;17(2):56–64. - PubMed
    1. Murante AM, Vainieri M, Rojas D, Nuti S. Does feedback influence patient - professional communication? Empirical evidence from Italy. Health Policy. 2014;116(2–3):273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Tusler M. Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Aff. 2003;22(2):84–94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.84. - DOI - PubMed