Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;30(2):227-230.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055549. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Compliance with San Francisco's flavoured tobacco sales prohibition

Affiliations

Compliance with San Francisco's flavoured tobacco sales prohibition

Priyanka Vyas et al. Tob Control. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: In June 2018, San Francisco voters upheld the first comprehensive prohibition on sales of flavoured tobacco products (all products including menthol, everywhere in the city with no exceptions).

Methods: This paper used data collected by the San Francisco Department of Public Health as part of its implementation and enforcement of San Francisco's city-wide ban on the sale of flavoured tobacco products. Every licensed tobacco retailer was visited and inspected. The San Francisco Department of Public Health and volunteers conducted an educational campaign from September 2018 to December 2018, including emailing all licensed tobacco retailers about the law, mailing a fact sheet poster, conducting four listening sessions and visiting permitted tobacco retailers to educate them about the law and solicit questions.

Results: Compliance inspections started in December 2018, which found that compliance was 17%. Compliance increased in January 2019 and averaged 80% between January 2019 and December 2019. After the phase-in period, all retailers were visited as part of routine inspections. This effort resulted in 80% compliance.

Conclusion: Including retailer education prior to enforcement can result in compliance with a comprehensive ban on the sale of menthol and other flavoured tobacco products.

Keywords: prevention; public policy; surveillance and monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: No, there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Retailer compliance to the San Francisco flavoured tobacco sales ban. Compliance was assessed based on in-store inspections. Numbers below the horizontal axis were number of retailers inspected each month by San Francisco Department of Public Health.

References

    1. Truth Initiative. Widespread use of flavored products in young tobacco users, 2019. Available: https://truthinitiative.org/research/widespread-use-flavored-products-yo...
    1. Family smoking prevention and tobacco control act, PUB. L. No. 111–31, 123. Stat. 1776 2009.
    1. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. States & Localities That Have Restricted the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products, 2020. Available: https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/factsheets/0398.pdf [Accessed 4 Feb 2020].
    1. Kingsley M, Song G, Robertson J, et al. Impact of flavoured tobacco restriction policies on flavoured product availability in Massachusetts. Tob Control 2020;29:tobaccocontrol-2018–054703. - PubMed
    1. Kingsley M, Setodji CM, Pane JD, et al. Short-Term impact of a flavored tobacco restriction: changes in youth tobacco use in a Massachusetts community. Am J Prev Med 2019;57:741–8. - PubMed

Publication types