Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019?
- PMID: 32301491
- PMCID: PMC7184471
- DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa189
Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019?
Abstract
Cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported in more than 200 countries. Thousands of health workers have been infected, and outbreaks have occurred in hospitals, aged care facilities, and prisons. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued guidelines for contact and droplet precautions for healthcare workers caring for suspected COVID-19 patients, whereas the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has initially recommended airborne precautions. The 1- to 2-meter (≈3-6 feet) rule of spatial separation is central to droplet precautions and assumes that large droplets do not travel further than 2 meters (≈6 feet). We aimed to review the evidence for horizontal distance traveled by droplets and the guidelines issued by the WHO, CDC, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control on respiratory protection for COVID-19. We found that the evidence base for current guidelines is sparse, and the available data do not support the 1- to 2-meter (≈3-6 feet) rule of spatial separation. Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6 feet), in some cases up to 8 meters (≈26 feet). Several studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) support aerosol transmission, and 1 study documented virus at a distance of 4 meters (≈13 feet) from the patient. Moreover, evidence suggests that infections cannot neatly be separated into the dichotomy of droplet versus airborne transmission routes. Available studies also show that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in the air, and remain viable 3 hours after aerosolization. The weight of combined evidence supports airborne precautions for the occupational health and safety of health workers treating patients with COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19; airborne transmission; droplet precautions; mask; respiratory protection.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Figures
Comment in
-
Infection and Inflammation of the Genitourinary Tract.J Urol. 2022 Apr;207(4):907-908. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002399. Epub 2022 Jan 5. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 34983187 No abstract available.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Rolling updates on coronavirus disease (COVID-19). [cited 2020 April 14] Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus- 2019/events-.... Accessed 14 April 2020.
-
- World Health Organization. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) situation reports. [cited 2020 January 31] Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus- 2019/situati.... Accessed 31 January 2020.
-
- Wölfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, et al. . Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature 2020. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. . Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001316 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Liu Y, Gayle AA, Wilder-Smith A, Rocklöv J. The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. J Travel Med 2020; 27. doi:10.1093/jtm/taaa021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous