Comparison of acidity and metal ion affinity of D-Glucosamine and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, a DFT study
- PMID: 32302939
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2020.107612
Comparison of acidity and metal ion affinity of D-Glucosamine and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, a DFT study
Abstract
The derivatives of glucose such as glucosamine (β-D-GlcN) and N-acetyl-D-β-glucosamine (GlcNAc) are significant in several biological systems. D-GlcN has been used widely to treat osteoarthritis in humans and animal models as well as GlcNAc has been proposed as a treatment for autoimmune diseases. The DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G (d,p) method as well as QTAIM and NBO analyses were used to the acidity values of D-GlcN and GlcNAc sugars and their complexes with alkali ions in the gas phase. The Li+, Na+ and K+ prefer bi-dentate chelate in these complexes. The computed results indicate that metal ion affinity (MIA) in GlcNAc is higher than that in D-GlcN. There are direct correlations between the MIA values of D-GlcN and GlcNAc sugars and the atomic numbers of Li, Na, and K. The calculated acidity values for GlcNAc at C2-NH and C6-HO6 sites are 331 and 333 kcal mol-1, respectively. Whereas the calculated acidity values for D-GlcN at C2-NH and C6-HO6 sites are 365 and 372 kcal mol-1, respectively. The AIM and NBO analyses indicate the presence of intramolecular H-bonds in GlcNAc sugar in both its neutral form and conjugate base; whereas D-GlcN indicates intramolecular H-bonds in only its conjugate base.
Keywords: AIM; Acidity; DFT; Glucosamine; H-bond; MIA; Metal cations; N-Acetyl-d-glucosamine.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
