Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 28;48(6):527-537.
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0450.

Women's decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing: an explorative study within Finnish public maternity care

An Chen  1 , Henni Tenhunen  1 , Paulus Torkki  1   2 , Seppo Heinonen  3 , Paul Lillrank  1 , Vedran Stefanovic  4
Affiliations

Women's decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing: an explorative study within Finnish public maternity care

An Chen et al. J Perinat Med. .

Abstract

Objectives To explore women's decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing (PreST) in Finland and to evaluate a counseling service. Methods Self-completion surveys were conducted at two medical settings (screening and further testing) of PreST. Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) was the main measure. Different types of statistical tests were used to compare women's decisional conflict at different medical settings of PreST, and before-after pre-test counseling. Multivariable linear regressions analyzed the influences of the medical settings and other factors on women's decisional conflict. Results Compared to women in population-based screening, women in further testing (before pre-test counseling) were more likely to feel well informed (P < 0.001), had increased values clarity (P < 0.001), but more likely experienced uncertainty (P = 0.040). Besides medical settings, maternal age, gravidity and previous experience of fetal aneuploidy significantly influenced decisional conflict. After counseling, screen-positive women felt better informed (P < 0.001), had increased values clarity (P < 0.001), perceived more support (P < 0.001), and had better decision certainty (P < 0.001) than before counseling. Conclusions Medical settings influence women's decisional conflict during PreST. Individual counseling is effective in improving screen-positive women's decisional conflict. This research adds knowledge and experience on developing decision-making supports across the pathway of PreST.

Keywords: counseling service; decision-making experience; decisional conflict; medical setting; prenatal screening and testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Lou S, Mikkelsen L, Hvidman L, Petersen OB, Nielsen CP. Does screening for Down’s syndrome cause anxiety in pregnant women? A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94:15–27.
    1. Schoonen H, van Agt H, Essink-Bot M-L, Wildschut H, Steegers E, de Koning H. Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome: what knowledge is relevant? Patient Educ Couns 2011;84:265–70.
    1. Sutherland S, Farrell RM, Lockwood C. Genetic screening and testing in an episode-based payment model: preserving patient autonomy. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:987–91.
    1. Stefanovic V. The importance of pre-and post-test counseling for prenatal cell-free DNA screening for common fetal aneuploidies. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2019;19:201–15.
    1. Allyse M, Sayres LC, Goodspeed T, Michie M, Cho MK. “Don’t want no risk and don’t want no problems”: public understandings of the risks and benefits of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2015;6:5–20.

LinkOut - more resources