Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;25(3):305-309.
doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000752.

Organ allocation in the age of the algorithm: avoiding futile transplantation - utility in allocation

Francois Faitot  1   2 , Baptiste Michard  1 , Thierry Artzner  1   3
Affiliations
Review

Organ allocation in the age of the algorithm: avoiding futile transplantation - utility in allocation

Francois Faitot et al. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review describes and questions the evolution of allocation systems from local team decisions in the 20th century to patient-oriented allocation using complex algorithm predicting transplant benefit.

Recent findings: The opening years of the 2000s have seen the implementation of prioritization scores aiming at increasing transparency and reducing waitlist mortality. The 2010s have underlined the necessity of drawing the upper limits of how sick a patient can be while still ensuring acceptable survival. More complex algorithms evaluating transplant benefit have been implemented in allocation systems to take this issue into account.

Summary: Allocation algorithms are becoming more and more complex, integrating numerous parameters from both donor and recipient to achieve optimal matching. The limitations of implementing these complex algorithms are represented by the evermoving waiting list demography, geographic disparities between recipients and donors, team policy adaptation to rule changes, and implicit biases within the transplant community. Survival as the only metric by which to define benefit may be seen as restrictive; quality of life may be a fruitful measure for better defining benefit in organ transplantation in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tschuor C, Ferrarese A, Kuemmerli C, et al. Allocation of liver grafts worldwide: is there a best system? J Hepatol 2019; 71:707–718.
    1. Johnson RJ, Bradbury LL, Martin K, et al. Organ donation and transplantation in the UK: the last decade: a report from the UK National Transplant registry. Transplantation 2014; 97:S1–27.
    1. Adam R, Karam V, Cailliez V, et al. Annual report of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR): 50-year evolution of liver transplantation. Transplant Int 2018; 31:1293–1317.
    1. Hsih EM, Thuita L, McNamara DM, et al. Variables of importance in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database predictive of heart transplant waitlist mortality. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2067–2076.
    1. Trivedi JR, Slaughter MS. Unintended consequences of changes in heart transplantation allocation policy: impact on practice pattern. ASAIO J 2020; 66:135–127.