Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review
- PMID: 32306377
- PMCID: PMC7318216
- DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13877
Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review
Abstract
Introduction: Currently fetal nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.5 mm is an indication for invasive testing often followed by chromosomal microarray. The aim of this study was to assess the risks for chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with an NT 3.0-3.4 mm, to determine whether invasive prenatal testing would be relevant in these cases and to assess the residual risks in fetuses with normal non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) results.
Material and methods: A retrospective study and meta-analysis of literature cases with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and 2 cohorts of pregnant women referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray was performed: Rotterdam region (with a risk >1:200 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested in the period July 2012 to June 2019 and Central Denmark region (with a risk >1:300 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested between September 2015 and December 2018.
Results: A total of 522 fetuses were referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray. Meta-analysis indicated that in 1:7.4 (13.5% [95% CI 8.2%-21.5%]) fetuses a chromosomal aberration was diagnosed. Of these aberrant cases, 47/68 (69%) involved trisomy 21, 18, and 13 and would potentially be detected by all NIPT approaches. The residual risk for missing a (sub)microscopic chromosome aberration depends on the NIPT approach and is highest if NIPT was performed only for common trisomies-1:21 (4.8% [95% CI 3.2%-7.3%]). However, it may be substantially lowered if a genome-wide 10-Mb resolution NIPT test was offered (~1:464).
Conclusions: Based on these data, we suggest that the NT cut-off for invasive testing could be 3.0 mm (instead of 3.5 mm) because of the high risk of 1:7.4 for a chromosomal aberration. If women were offered NIPT first, there would be a significant diagnostic delay because all abnormal NIPT results need to be confirmed by diagnostic testing. If the woman had already received a normal NIPT result, the residual risk of 1:21 to 1:464 for chromosome aberrations other than common trisomies, dependent on the NIPT approach, should be raised. If a pregnant woman declines invasive testing, but still wants a test with a broader coverage of clinically significant conditions then the genome-wide >10-Mb resolution NIPT test, which detects most aberrations, could be proposed.
Keywords: microarray; microdeletion; non-invasive prenatal test; nuchal translucency; prenatal diagnosis; submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.
© 2020 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Is Nuchal Translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an Indication for cfDNA Testing or Microarray? - A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024;51(5):453-462. doi: 10.1159/000539463. Epub 2024 May 31. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024. PMID: 38815555 Free PMC article.
-
Combined first-trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide study of prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPT.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):470-479. doi: 10.1002/uog.27667. Epub 2024 Sep 4. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38642365
-
Selection of prenatal screening with nuchal translucency > 95th centile and below 99th centile: a 4-year observational study with real-world data.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1779-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07500-7. Epub 2024 Apr 16. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38625542
-
Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of maternal plasma DNA: review of 1982 consecutive cases in a single center.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;43(3):254-64. doi: 10.1002/uog.13277. Epub 2014 Feb 10. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24339153 Review.
-
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;42(1):15-33. doi: 10.1002/uog.12513. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23765643 Review.
Cited by
-
A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;13(1):48. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010048. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36611340 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in diagnostic assessment of abnormal Down syndrome screening results.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05139-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 36333674 Free PMC article.
-
Cytogenetically Balanced Reciprocal Translocation Could Hide Molecular Genomic Unbalances: Implications for Foetal Phenotype Correlation.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;14(16):1732. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161732. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39202220 Free PMC article.
-
Is Nuchal Translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an Indication for cfDNA Testing or Microarray? - A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024;51(5):453-462. doi: 10.1159/000539463. Epub 2024 May 31. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024. PMID: 38815555 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing fetal diagnosis and prognostication using comprehensive prenatal phenotyping and genetic testing.Pediatr Res. 2025 Mar;97(4):1269-1279. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03343-9. Epub 2024 Jun 27. Pediatr Res. 2025. PMID: 38937640 Review.
References
-
- Snijders RJ, Noble P, Sebire N, Souka A, Nicolaides KH. UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal‐translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9125):343‐346. - PubMed
-
- Souka AP, Von Kaisenberg CS, Hyett JA, Sonek JD, Nicolaides KH. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(4):1005‐1021. - PubMed
-
- Bilardo CM, Muller MA, Pajkrt E, Clur SA, van Zalen MM, Bijlsma EK. Increased nuchal translucency thickness and normal karyotype: time for parental reassurance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(1):11‐18. - PubMed
-
- Lund IC, Christensen R, Petersen OB, Vogel I, Vestergaard EM. Chromosomal microarray in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(1):95‐100. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous