Risk for non-home discharge following surgery for ischemic mitral valve disease
- PMID: 32307181
- PMCID: PMC7874266
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.084
Risk for non-home discharge following surgery for ischemic mitral valve disease
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the frequency and risk factors for non-home discharge (NHD) and its association with clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) at 1 year following cardiac surgery in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).
Methods: Discharge disposition was evaluated in 552 patients enrolled in trials of severe or moderate IMR. Patient and in-hospital factors associated with NHD were identified using logistic regression. Subsequently, association of NHD with 1-year mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs), and QOL was assessed.
Results: NHD was observed in 30% (154/522) with 25% (n = 71/289) in moderate and 36% (n = 83/233) in patients with severe IMR (unadjusted P = .006), a difference not significant after including age (5-year change: adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.72; P < .001), diabetes (adjOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.27-2.94; P = .002), and previous heart failure (adjOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.06-2.52; P = .03). Odds of NHD were increased for patients with postoperative SAEs (adjOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.19-2.86; P = .01) but not based on type of cardiac surgery. Greater rates of death and SAEs were observed in NHD patients at 1 year: adjusted hazard ratio, 4.29 (95% CI, 2.14-8.59; P < .001) and adjusted rate ratio, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.03-2.02; P = .03), respectively. QOL did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusions: NHD is common following surgery for IMR, influenced by older age, diabetes, previous heart failure, and postoperative SAEs. These patients may be at greater risk of death and subsequent SAEs after discharge. Discussion of NHD with patients may have important implications for decision-making and guiding expectations following cardiac surgery.
Keywords: mitral regurgitation; mitral valve disease; non-home discharge; postoperative SAE; quality of life.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures





Comment in
-
Commentary: Are serious adverse events inevitable?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Dec;162(6):1779-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.036. Epub 2020 Mar 20. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32305189 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: Ptolemy versus Copernicus: The times they are a-changin'.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Dec;162(6):1780-1781. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.102. Epub 2020 Apr 6. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32359896 No abstract available.
References
-
- Gammie JS, O’Brien SM, Griffith BP, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Influence of hospital procedural volume on care process and mortality for patients undergoing elective surgery for mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2007. February 20;115:881–7. - PubMed
-
- Geissler HJ, Hölzl P, Marohl S, Kuhn-Régnier F, Mehlhorn U, Südkamp M, et al. Risk stratification in heart surgery: comparison of six score systems. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000. April;17:400–6. - PubMed
-
- Spaziano M, Carrier M, Pellerin M, Choinière M. Quality of life following heart valve replacement in the elderly. J Heart Valve Dis. 2010. July;19:524–32. - PubMed
-
- Edgerton J, Filardo G, Ryan WH, Brinkman WT, Smith RL, Hebeler RF Jr, et al. Risk of not being discharged home after isolated coronary artery bypass graft operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013. October;96:1287–1292. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources