Disparities in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performed by a Family Member and a Non-family Member
- PMID: 32307352
- PMCID: PMC7940978
- DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20200068
Disparities in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performed by a Family Member and a Non-family Member
Abstract
Background: Although bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) plays an essential role in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care, little is known about the bystander-patient relationship in the actual setting. This study aimed to assess the disparities in BCPR performed by a family member and that performed by a non-family member.
Methods: This population-based observational study involved all adult patients with witnessed OHCAs of medical origin in Niigata City, Japan, between January 2012 and December 2016, according to the Utstein style. We used logistic regression analysis to assess the association between the witnessing person and the probability of providing BCPR. Next, among those who received BCPR, we sought to investigate the difference between BCPR performed by family and that performed by non-family members in terms of whether those who witnessed the arrests actually performed BCPR.
Results: During the study period, 818 were eligible for this analysis, with 609 (74.4%) patients witnessed by family and 209 (25.6%) patients witnessed by non-family members. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that OHCA patients witnessed by family were less likely to receive BCPR compared to those witnessed by non-family members (260/609 [42.7%] versus 119/209 [56.9%], P = 0.017). Among the witnessed patients for whom BCPR was performed, the proportion of BCPR actually performed by a family member was lower than that performed by a non-family member (242/260 [93.1%] versus 116/119 [97.5%], P = 0.011).
Conclusions: In this community-based observational study, we found that a witnessing family member is less likely to perform BCPR than a witnessing non-family member.
Keywords: bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sex-Based Disparities in Receiving Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Location of Cardiac Arrest in Japan.Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Apr;94(4):577-587. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.12.028. Epub 2019 Mar 25. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019. PMID: 30922691
-
Temporal variations in dispatcher-assisted and bystander-initiated resuscitation efforts.Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;36(12):2203-2210. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.080. Epub 2018 Apr 3. Am J Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29661664
-
Collaborative effects of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and prehospital advanced cardiac life support by physicians on survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide population-based observational study.Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R199. doi: 10.1186/cc9319. Epub 2010 Nov 4. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 21050434 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 11;26(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0552-8. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 30309373 Free PMC article.
-
Global Sex Disparities in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e035794. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035794. Epub 2024 Sep 9. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39248262 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Willingness and Barriers to Undertaking Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Reported by Medical Students after the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic-Single-Center Study.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 13;13(2):438. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020438. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256572 Free PMC article.
-
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Paris, France: a population-based, observational study.Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e437-e443. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30117-1. Epub 2020 May 27. Lancet Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32473113 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of different relationships of bystanders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients on the effectiveness of dispatcher-assisted CPR.BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01244-6. BMC Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 40461969 Free PMC article.
-
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and bystander response by socioeconomic disadvantage in communities of New South Wales, Australia.Resusc Plus. 2022 Feb 6;9:100205. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100205. eCollection 2022 Mar. Resusc Plus. 2022. PMID: 35199073 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in community and ambulance care processes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04749-9. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35039578 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kronick SL, Kurz MC, Lin S, et al. . Part 4: Systems of Care and Continuous Quality Improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S397–S413. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000258 - DOI - PubMed