Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;71(3):423-443.
doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12746. Epub 2020 Apr 19.

Put to the test: For a new sociology of testing

Affiliations

Put to the test: For a new sociology of testing

Noortje Marres et al. Br J Sociol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

In an age defined by computational innovation, testing seems to have become ubiquitous, and tests are routinely deployed as a form of governance, a marketing device, an instrument for political intervention, and an everyday practice to evaluate the self. This essay argues that something more radical is happening here than simply attempts to move tests from the laboratory into social settings. The challenge that a new sociology of testing must address is that ubiquitous testing changes the relations between science, engineering, and sociology: Engineering is today in the very stuff of where society happens. It is not that the tests of 21st-century engineering occur within a social context but that it is the very fabric of the social that is being put to the test. To understand how testing and the social relate today, we must investigate how testing operates on social life, through the modification of its settings. One way to clarify the difference is to say that the new forms of testing can be captured neither within the logic of the field test nor of the controlled experiment. Whereas tests once happened inside social environments, today's tests directly and deliberately modify the social environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agüera y Arcas, B. , Todorov, A. , & Mitchell, M. (2018, January 11). Do algorithms reveal sexual orientation or just expose our stereotypes? medium.com. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@blaisea/do‐algorithms‐reveal‐sexual‐orientation‐or‐j...
    1. Akrich, M. (1992). ‘The de‐scription of technical objects In Bijker W. E. & Law J. (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. Arms Control Association . (2019, February). The nuclear testing tally. armscontrol.org. Retrieved from https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/nucleartesttally
    1. Ausloos, J. (2018, April 10). Paul‐Olivier Dehaye and the raiders of the lost data. law.kuleuven.be. Retrieved from https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/blog/paul‐olivier‐dehaye‐and‐the‐raide...
    1. Bacharach, Y. , Grepel, T. , Kohli, P. , Kosinski, M. , & Stillwell, D. (2014). Your digital image: Factors behind demographic and psychometric predictions fro social network profiles In AAAMAS ’14: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi‐Agent Systems. Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources