Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;30(5):686-691.
doi: 10.1017/S1047951120000785. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

Fetal CHD and perinatal outcomes

Christina J Ge  1 , Amanda C Mahle  2 , Irina Burd  2 , Eric B Jelin  3 , Priya Sekar #  4 , Angie C Jelin #  2
Affiliations

Fetal CHD and perinatal outcomes

Christina J Ge et al. Cardiol Young. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate delivery management and outcomes in fetuses prenatally diagnosed with CHD.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 6194 fetuses (born between 2013 and 2016), comparing prenatally diagnosed with CHD (170) to those with non-cardiac (234) and no anomalies (5790). Primary outcomes included the incidence of preterm delivery and mode of delivery.

Results: Gestational age at delivery was significantly lower between the CHD and non-anomalous cohorts (38.6 and 39.1 weeks, respectively). Neonates with CHD had a significantly lower birth weights (p < 0.001). There was an approximately 1.5-fold increase in the rate of primary cesarean sections associated with prenatally diagnosed CHD with an odds ratio of 1.49 (95% CI 1.06-2.10).

Conclusions: Our study provides additional evidence that the prenatal diagnosis of CHD is associated with a lower birth weight, preterm delivery, and with an increased risk of delivery by primary cesarean section.

Keywords: CHD; fetal anomalies; prenatal; preterm delivery; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest. None.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, Mahle WT, Correa A. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998–2005. J Pediatr 2008; 153: 807–813. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holland BJ, Myers JA, Woods CR Jr. Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 631–638. - PubMed
    1. Khoshnood B, Lelong N, Houyel L, et al. Prevalence, timing of diagnosis and mortality of newborns with congenital heart defects: a population-based study. Heart 2012; 98: 1667–1673. - PubMed
    1. Khoshnood B, Lelong N, Houyel L, et al. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival of newborns with four congenital heart defects: a prospective, population-based cohort study in France (the EPICARD Study). BMJ Open 2017; 7: e018285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahle WT, Clancy RR, McGaurn SP, Goin JE, Clark BJ. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival and early neurologic morbidity in neonates with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 1277–1282. - PubMed