Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 10:19:21.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00415-z. eCollection 2020.

Psychometric properties of the intensive care delirium screening checklist when used by bedside nurses in clinical practice: a prospective descriptive study

Elke Detroyer  1   2 , Annick Timmermans  1   3 , Dana Segers  1   4 , Geert Meyfroidt  5 , Jasperina Dubois  3 , Aimé Van Assche  3 , Etienne Joosten  2 , Koen Milisen  1   2
Affiliations

Psychometric properties of the intensive care delirium screening checklist when used by bedside nurses in clinical practice: a prospective descriptive study

Elke Detroyer et al. BMC Nurs. .

Abstract

Background: The Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) demonstrates good psychometric characteristics in research settings. However, evidence about these characteristics in pragmatic ICU settings is inconsistent. This study evaluated psychometric properties and user-friendliness of the ICDSC when administered by ICU nurses in daily practice.

Methods: This prospective study included 77 patients from a surgical intensive care unit. To examine the psychometric characteristics, the scores on the ICDSC (performed by bedside nurses) were compared with the scores on the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) (performed by researchers as gold standard). The user-friendliness was evaluated by 34 ICU nurses with a 20-item questionnaire.

Results: The ICDSC had an area under the curve of 0.843. It showed a good diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 81.0%, a specificity of 87.7%, and a 53.1% positive and 96.4% negative predictive value. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all ICDSC scores was high (0.839). Overall, ICU nurses experienced the ICDSC as easy-to-use. The scale was usable in most surgical ICU patients. Yet, some nurses (11.8%) had problems to score the items 'inappropriate speech' and 'symptom fluctuation' in intubated patients.

Conclusions: The ICDSC is a valid and user-friendly tool for delirium screening in daily ICU nursing practice. Yet, some problems were reported in intubated patients. Therefore, validation studies with specific focus on intubated patients are needed.

Keywords: Delirium; Intensive care delirium screening checklist; Psychometrics; Sensitivity and specificity; User-friendliness; Validation studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the study sample in patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curve of the ICDSC scores compared with the CAM-ICU as reference standard. ROC: receiver operating characteristic; ICDSC: Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist; CAM-ICU: Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit; Sn: sensitivity; Sp: specificity
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. Neurocognitive disorders; pp. 591–643.
    1. Mehta S, Cook D, Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Meade M, Fergusson D, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of delirium in mechanically ventilated adults. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(3):557–566. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000727. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jackson P, Khan A. Delirium in critically ill patients. Crit Care Clin. 2015;31(3):589–603. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2015.03.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salluh JI, Wang H, Schneider EB, Nagaraja N, Yenokyan G, Damluij A, et al. Outcome of delirium in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h2538. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2538. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Witlox J, Eurelings LS, de Jonghe JF, Kalisvaart KJ, Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA. Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;304:443–451. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1013. - DOI - PubMed