Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 1:2020:5380346.
doi: 10.1155/2020/5380346. eCollection 2020.

Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease: A Hurdle in the Path of Remedy

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease: A Hurdle in the Path of Remedy

Alexandra E Oxford et al. Int J Alzheimers Dis. .

Abstract

Human clinical trials seek to ameliorate the disease states and symptomatic progression of illnesses that, as of yet, are largely untreatable according to clinical standards. Ideally, clinical trials test "disease-modifying drugs," i.e., therapeutic agents that specifically modify pathological features or molecular bases of the disease and would presumably have a large impact on disease progression. In the case of Alzheimer's disease (AD), however, this approach appears to have stalled progress in the successful development of clinically useful therapies. For the last 25 years, clinical trials involving AD have centered on beta-amyloid (Aβ) and the Aβ hypothesis of AD progression and pathology. According to this hypothesis, the progression of AD begins following an accumulation of Aβ peptide, leading to eventual synapse loss and neuronal cell death: the true overriding pathological feature of AD. Clinical trials arising from the Aβ hypothesis target causal steps in the pathway in order to reduce the formation of Aβ or enhance clearance, and though agents have been successful in this aim, they remain unsuccessful in rescuing cognitive function or slowing cognitive decline. As such, further use of resources in the development of treatment options for AD that target Aβ, its precursors, or its products should be reevaluated. The purpose of this review was to give an overview of how human clinical trials are conducted in the USA and to assess the results of recent failed trials involving AD, the majority of which were based on the Aβ hypothesis. Based on these current findings, it is suggested that lowering Aβ is an unproven strategy, and it may be time to refocus on other targets for the treatment of this disease including pathological forms of tau.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

TR, ES, and AO declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The challenges of treating CNS disorders. Both subjective and objective hurdles must be surpassed when developing pharmaceuticals for the treatment of CNS disorders and diseases. Overcoming these hurdles has proven difficult leading to a minimum an increase in time and cost for drug development and at a worse to many drug failures that would otherwise be realized for a systemic-related disorder.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Aβ cascade and potential therapeutics that have recently failed in human clinical trials. A highly schematic drawing illustrating the main steps involved in Aβ production and deposition as thought to occur in the AD brain. Production begins following cleavage of APP by β- or γ-secretases followed by the formation of oligomers and fibrils that eventually deposit into extracellular plaques. Broadly, therapeutics shown are targeted to either Aβ formation or clearance mediated by microglia. In addition, the connection of Aβ to eventual synapse loss and cell death is linked through tangle development.

References

    1. Hyman S. E. Revolution stalled. Science Translational Medicine. 2012;4(155):p. 155cm11. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003142. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colloca L., Benedetti F. Placebos and painkillers: is mind as real as matter? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2005;6(7):545–552. doi: 10.1038/nrn1705. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mestre T. A., Lang A. E. Placebos in clinical trials: unravelling a complex phenomenon. Lancet Neurology. 2017;16(1):28–29. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30349-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aisen P. S. Cognitive/clinical endpoints for pre-dementia AD trials. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease. 2015;2(2):82–84. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2015.62. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pardridge W. M. The blood-brain barrier: bottleneck in brain drug development. NeuroRx. 2005;2(1):3–14. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.2.1.3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed