Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;10(2):131-139.
doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000713.

Ataxic-hypotonic cerebral palsy in a cerebral palsy registry: Insights into a distinct subtype

Affiliations

Ataxic-hypotonic cerebral palsy in a cerebral palsy registry: Insights into a distinct subtype

Jake P Levy et al. Neurol Clin Pract. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To specifically report on ataxic-hypotonic cerebral palsy (CP) using registry data and to directly compare its features with other CP subtypes.

Methods: Data on prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal characteristics and gross motor function (Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS]) and comorbidities in 35 children with ataxic-hypotonic CP were extracted from the Canadian Cerebral Palsy Registry and compared with 1,804 patients with other subtypes of CP.

Results: Perinatal adversity was detected significantly more frequently in other subtypes of CP (odds ratio [OR] 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-11.7). The gestational age at birth was higher in ataxic-hypotonic CP (median 39.0 weeks vs 37.0 weeks, p = 0.027). Children with ataxic-hypotonic CP displayed more intrauterine growth restriction (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.0-6.8) and congenital malformation (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.8). MRI was more likely to be either normal (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.4-10.5) or to show a cerebral malformation (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.5-11.9) in ataxic-hypotonic CP. There was no significant difference in terms of GMFCS or the presence of comorbidities, except for more frequent communication impairment in ataxic-hypotonic CP (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.5-11.6).

Conclusions: Our results suggest a predominantly genetic or prenatal etiology for ataxic-hypotonic CP and imply that a diagnosis of ataxic-hypotonic CP does not impart a worse prognosis with respect to comorbidities or functional impairment. This study contributes toward a better understanding of ataxic-hypotonic CP as a distinct nosologic entity within the spectrum of CP with its own pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical profile, and prognosis compared with other CP subtypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure. Participant flow diagram

References

    1. Graham HK, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, et al. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:15082. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wimalasundera N, Stevenson VL. Cerebral palsy. Pract Neurol 2016;16:184–194. - PubMed
    1. Smithers-Sheedy H, Badawi N, Blair E, et al. What constitutes cerebral palsy in the twenty-first century? Dev Med Child Neurol 2014;56:323–328. - PubMed
    1. Shevell M, Dagenais L, Oskoui M. The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: new perspectives from a Canadian registry. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2013;20:60–64. - PubMed
    1. Reid SM, Carlin JB, Reddihough DS. Distribution of motor types in cerebral palsy: how do registry data compare? Dev Med Child Neurol 2011;53:233–238. - PubMed