Quality Measures in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Identifying Metrics to Improve Care
- PMID: 32309080
- PMCID: PMC7159953
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002630
Quality Measures in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Identifying Metrics to Improve Care
Abstract
Background: Specific measures tailored to the properties of individual procedures will ensure the appropriate evaluation of quality. Because postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is becoming increasingly common, a review of the literature is timely to identify potential breast reconstruction-specific measures that can be applied by institutions and national healthcare organizations to improve quality.
Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for studies examining the quality of care for patients undergoing PMBR. Data extracted from the articles include basic study characteristics, the number of quality metrics, type of quality metric (defined by Donabedian model), and the domain of quality (defined by the National Academy of Medicine).
Results: A total of 2,158 articles were identified in the initial search, and 440 studies were included for data extraction. The most common type of quality measure was outcome measures (91%), and the least common measure was structure measures (1%). The most common metrics were operative time (41%), hospital type (28%), and aspects of the patient-provider interactions (20%). Additionally, we found that timeliness and equity were least common among the 6 National Academy of Medicine domains.
Conclusions: We identified metrics utilized in the PMBR, some of which can be further investigated through high-level evidence studies and incorporated into policy. Because many factors influence surgical outcomes and breast reconstruction is driven by patient preferences, an inclusion of structure, process, and outcome metrics will help improve care for this patient population. Moreover, nonpunitive initiatives, specifically quality collaboratives, may provide an avenue to improve care quality without compromising patient safety.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Figures
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health expenditures. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/health-expenditures.htm. Accessed July 8, 2019.
-
- The Commonwealth Fund. Health Care System Performance Rankings. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/chart/2017/health-care-system-performan.... Accessed June 20, 2019.
-
- Porter ME. A strategy for health care reform—toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:109–112. - PubMed
-
- Burwell SM. Setting value-based payment goals—HHS efforts to improve US health care. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:897–899. - PubMed
-
- Cima RR, Lackore KA, Nehring SA, et al. How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution. Surgery. 2011;150:943–949. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources