Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar 31;2(1):e11.
doi: 10.15190/d.2014.3.

Blood Transfusion in the 21st Century

Affiliations
Review

Blood Transfusion in the 21st Century

Mark T Friedman et al. Discoveries (Craiova). .

Abstract

Blood transfusion is a common procedure in the hospital setting, and the safety of the blood supply has been vastly improved over the past few decades largely due to improvements in screening for viral transmissible diseases, especially human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and viral hepatitis. However, more recent efforts to improve blood safety have focused on non-transmissible disease risks such as transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), non-viral transmissible diseases such as bacterial contamination of blood products (especially platelet components which are stored at room temperature) and Chagas disease (a parasitic disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi), and prion transmissible agents (e.g., variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, also known as the agent of mad cow disease) as well as more recently-recognized transmissible viral disease risks such as West Nile virus. Appropriate blood utilization has also come under more intense scrutiny in recent times due to healthcare costs and the recognition that many blood transfusions are given under circumstances in which the benefit to the patients is unclear and may be potentially harmful due to the above risks as well as the emerging concept that blood transfusions may cause long-term damage to the immune system resulting in worse patient morbidity and mortality outcomes. Toward that end, accreditation agencies such as the Joint Commission and the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) are advocating for healthcare organizations to implement appropriate patient blood management strategies. This review will examine these issues along with newer blood safety technological innovations and further highlight contributing studies from our institutions.

Keywords: Blood substitutes; factor concentrates; hemovigilance; patient blood management; transfusion medicine education; transfusion safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Transfusion safety schematic

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services 2009 national blood collection and utilization survey report. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Washington DC. 2011.
    1. Perioperative myocardial ischemic episodes are related to hematocrit level in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Hogue C W, Goodnough L T, Monk T G. Transfusion. 1998;38(10):924–31. - PubMed
    1. Blood transfusion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Wu W C, Rathore S S, Wang Y, Radford M J, Krumholz H M. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;345(17):1230–6. - PubMed
    1. Anemia and red blood cell transfusion in neurocritical care. Kramer Andreas H, Zygun David A. Critical care (London, England) 2009;13(3):R89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Hébert P C, Wells G, Blajchman M A, Marshall J, Martin C, Pagliarello G, Tweeddale M, Schweitzer I, Yetisir E. The New England journal of medicine. 1999;340(6):409–17. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources