Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):831-842.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0440.

Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Mara A Schonberg et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Abstract

Importance: Guidelines recommend that women 75 years and older be informed of the benefits and harms of mammography before screening.

Objective: To test the effects of receipt of a paper-based mammography screening decision aid (DA) for women 75 years and older on their screening decisions.

Design, setting, and participants: A cluster randomized clinical trial with clinician as the unit of randomization. All analyses were completed on an intent-to-treat basis. The setting was 11 primary care practices in Massachusetts or North Carolina. Of 1247 eligible women reached, 546 aged 75 to 89 years without breast cancer or dementia who had a mammogram within 24 months but not within 6 months and saw 1 of 137 clinicians (herein referred to as PCPs) from November 3, 2014, to January 26, 2017, participated. A research assistant (RA) administered a previsit questionnaire on each participant's health, breast cancer risk factors, sociodemographic characteristics, and screening intentions. After the visit, the RA administered a postvisit questionnaire on screening intentions and knowledge.

Interventions: Receipt of the DA (DA arm) or a home safety (HS) pamphlet (control arm) before a PCP visit.

Main outcomes and measures: Participants were followed up for 18 months for receipt of mammography screening (primary outcome). To examine the effects of the DA, marginal logistic regression models were fit using generalized estimating equations to allow for clustering by PCP. Adjusted probabilities and risk differences were estimated to account for clustering by PCP.

Results: Of 546 women in the study, 283 (51.8%) received the DA. Patients in each arm were well matched; their mean (SD) age was 79.8 (3.7) years, 428 (78.4%) were non-Hispanic white, 321 (of 543 [59.1%]) had completed college, and 192 (35.2%) had less than a 10-year life expectancy. After 18 months, 9.1% (95% CI, 1.2%-16.9%) fewer women in the DA arm than in the control arm had undergone mammography screening (51.3% vs 60.4%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006). Women in the DA arm were more likely than those in the control arm to rate their screening intentions lower from previsit to postvisit (69 of 283 [adjusted %, 24.5%] vs 47 of 263 [adjusted %, 15.3%]), to be more knowledgeable about the benefits and harms of screening (86 [adjusted %, 25.5%] vs 32 [adjusted %, 11.7%]), and to have a documented discussion about mammography with their PCP (146 [adjusted %, 47.4%] vs 111 [adjusted %, 38.9%]). Almost all women in the DA arm (94.9%) would recommend the DA.

Conclusions and relevance: Providing women 75 years and older with a mammography screening DA before a PCP visit helps them make more informed screening decisions and leads to fewer women choosing to be screened, suggesting that the DA may help reduce overscreening.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02198690.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Schonberg reported receiving grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and receiving royalties for reviewing an UpToDate page on geriatric health maintenance. Drs Wee, Marcantonio, and Davis reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Diagram of Screening, Enrollment, and Follow-up of Trial Participants
DA indicates decision aid; HS, home safety; LCIS, lobular cancer in situ; PCP, primary care provider; and RA, research assistant.

Comment in

References

    1. Cancer Query System SEER incidence statistics. Accessed September 8, 2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/canques/incidence.html
    1. Vincent GK, Velkoff VA The next four decades: the older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. US Dept of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau; 2010. Appendix Table A-3. Projections of the older population by selected age group and sex, and sex ratios for the United States: 2010 to 2050. Published May 2010. Accessed March 9, 2020. https://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/p25-1138.pdf
    1. Pace LE, Keating NL. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. JAMA. 2014;311(13):1327-1335. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1398 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 2002;359(9310):909-919. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):244-255. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data