Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Nov;99(11):1458-1468.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13874. Epub 2020 May 15.

Shear-wave sonoelastographic assessment of cervix in pregnancy

Honglei Duan  1 , Piya Chaemsaithong  2 , Xiaoqing Ju  2 , Sin Yee Stella Ho  3 , Qian Sun  4 , Yi-Yun Tai  5 , Tak Yeung Leung  2 , Liona C Poon  2
Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Shear-wave sonoelastographic assessment of cervix in pregnancy

Honglei Duan et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in shear-wave sonoelastography (SWS) scores between the different parts of cervix, explore the association between the cervical SWS scores with cervical length and evaluate repeatability of the measurement of cervical SWS scores.

Material and methods: This was a prospective study performed in women with singleton pregnancy at 11-13+6 (n = 676), 16-20+6 (n = 364), 21-24+6 (n = 338) and 28-32+6 weeks (n = 304). The SWS scores were obtained at the inner, middle and external parts of the cervix, using a transvaginal ultrasound approach.

Results: The SWS scores of the inner cervix were significantly higher than the measurements acquired at the middle and external parts (all P < .001). At 21-24+6 and 28-32+6 weeks, most regions of interest demonstrated a very weak positive correlation with cervical length (r = .125 to r = .299). In comparison with nulliparous women, parous women without prior preterm birth had higher SWS scores of the inner and middle parts of the cervix at 16-20+6 and 21-24+6 weeks. All regions of interest showed good intra- and inter-observer agreement.

Conclusions: The assessment of the cervical SWS scores is highly reproducible. The stiffness of the cervix demonstrates a gradient that decreases from the inner part to the external part and a very weak positive correlation with cervical length.

Keywords: cervix; elastography; pregnancy; preterm birth; shear-wave sonoelastography; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345:760-765.
    1. Sananès N, Langer B, Gaudineau A, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies: where are we and where are we going? A review of literature. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34:457-461.
    1. Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides KH. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:462-469.
    1. Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:18-31.
    1. McIntosh J, Feltovich H, Berghella V, Manuck T. The role of routine cervical length screening in selected high- and low-risk women for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:B2-7.

Publication types