Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Apr;99(16):e19706.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019706.

The effectiveness of intra-articular vs subacromial corticosteroid injection for frozen shoulder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Yanbiao Wang  1 , Jing Gong  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The effectiveness of intra-articular vs subacromial corticosteroid injection for frozen shoulder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Yanbiao Wang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr.

Expression of concern in

  • Expression of Concern: Study Protocols.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Nov 7;104(45):e46330. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000046330. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 41204616 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid injection is a commonly used therapy for frozen shoulder (FS), but controversy still exists regarding the injection site with the best outcome. This randomized controlled trial is designed to determine whether corticosteroid injection into the subacromial space was not inferior to IA injection in patients with FS.

Methods: This study will be a single-center, randomized, and double-blinded trial. Sixty patients who meet inclusion criteria will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either subacromial injection or IA injection group. The outcome evaluations will be conducted at 4 time points (baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the injection) by an independent physical therapist. The primary outcome measure is visual analog scale for pain, whereas the secondary outcomes include Constant score, and shoulder passive range of motion including abduction, forward elevation, external rotation at the side, and internal rotation at the side.

Discussion: This study has limited inclusion and exclusion criteria and a well-controlled intervention. This clinical trial is expected to provide evidence of proper site of corticosteroid injection for the treatment of FS.

Trial registration: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5368).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tamai K, Akutsu M, Yano Y. Primary frozen shoulder: brief review of pathology and imaging abnormalities. J Orthop Sci 2014;19:1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lubiecki M, Carr A. Frozen shoulder: past, present, and future. J Orthop Surg 2007;15:1–3. - PubMed
    1. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, et al. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:959–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dias R, Cutts S, Massoud S. Frozen shoulder. BMJ 2005;331:1453–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson CM, Seah KT, Chee YH, et al. Frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:1–9. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances