Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 21;15(1):88.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1.

Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology

Affiliations
Review

Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology

M Unterrainer et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Radiotherapy and radiation oncology play a key role in the clinical management of patients suffering from oncological diseases. In clinical routine, anatomic imaging such as contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are widely available and are usually used to improve the target volume delineation for subsequent radiotherapy. Moreover, these modalities are also used for treatment monitoring after radiotherapy. However, some diagnostic questions cannot be sufficiently addressed by the mere use standard morphological imaging. Therefore, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging gains increasing clinical significance in the management of oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy, as PET allows the visualization and quantification of tumoral features on a molecular level beyond the mere morphological extent shown by conventional imaging, such as tumor metabolism or receptor expression. The tumor metabolism or receptor expression information derived from PET can be used as tool for visualization of tumor extent, for assessing response during and after therapy, for prediction of patterns of failure and for definition of the volume in need of dose-escalation. This review focuses on recent and current advances of PET imaging within the field of clinical radiotherapy / radiation oncology in several oncological entities (neuro-oncology, head & neck cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal tumors and prostate cancer) with particular emphasis on radiotherapy planning, response assessment after radiotherapy and prognostication.

Keywords: GI malignancies; Head & neck cancer; Lung cancer; Neuro-oncology; PET; Prostate cancer; Radiation oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no relationships or interests that could have direct or potential influence or impart bias on the work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A 54 years-old female patient with extensive edema on T2 MRI (a) and new contrast enhancing lesions at the temporal and occipital lobe (b) after undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from malignant melanoma at both sites. MRI findings were suggestive for tumor recurrence, whereas only a faint uptake on 18F-FET PET (c) and fused PET/MRI (d) was seen in both lesions, a finding typical for radiation necrosis. Radiation necrosis was subsequently confirmed by histopathology
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient with HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the right tonsil (T1 cN3 M0), who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT for staging prior to radiotherapy and subsequent inclusion of PET-positive tumor masses and lymph nodes in radiotherapy planning
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A patient with newly diagnosed NSCLC (cT2b N3 M1b) and 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging (a) and inclusion in radiotherapy planning (b)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A 68-years old male patient with newly diagnosed anal cancer Stage IIIC (cT4 cN1 cM0) and 18F-FDG PET/CT with 18F-FDG avid primary tumor and inguinal lymph node (a). 18F-FDG PET/CT was then used for radiotherapy planning with boost to the right inguinal lymph nodes and primary tumor (b)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A 69-years old patient with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (pT2c pN0 R0 Gleason score 9, preoperative PSA 11.7 ng/ml) and evidence of PET-positive lymph node metastases (a) and radiotherapy-plan with dose-escalation to the PET-positive lymph nodes (b)

References

    1. Bernier J, Hall EJ, Giaccia A. Radiation oncology: a century of achievements. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(9):737. doi: 10.1038/nrc1451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moran JM, Elshaikh MA, Lawrence TS. Radiotherapy: what can be achieved by technical improvements in dose delivery? Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(1):51–58. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70026-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bortfeld T. IMRT: a review and preview. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(13):R363. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R21. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langen K-J, Galldiks N, Hattingen E, Shah NJ. Advances in neuro-oncology imaging. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(5):279. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.44. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–354. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed