Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Apr 7:2020:2091915.
doi: 10.1155/2020/2091915. eCollection 2020.

A Mislocated Intrauterine Device Migrating to the Urinary Bladder: An Uncommon Complication Leading to Stone Formation

Affiliations
Case Reports

A Mislocated Intrauterine Device Migrating to the Urinary Bladder: An Uncommon Complication Leading to Stone Formation

Mohamed Ali Nouioui et al. Case Rep Urol. .

Abstract

Intrauterine devices are a popular form of reversible contraception among women. Its administration can lead to some uncommon but serious complications such as perforation leading to its migration into adjacent organs. Like any foreign body, the presence of an IUD in the bladder can result in stone formation due to its lithogenic potential. We report a case of an IUD migrating from its normal position in the uterine cavity into the urinary bladder causing chronic low urinary tract symptoms in a 43-year-old female patient. The device was securely removed without complications using grasping forceps under cystoscopy, and no parietal defect was detected. A mislocated IUD is a rare complication that should be considered in female patients presenting with chronic urinary symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pelvic US revealing an echogenic intravesical foreign object (arrow) initially suggestive of urinary bladder calculus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A mislocated IUD in the lower left quadrant of the abdomen showed on the plain abdominal X-ray.

References

    1. Kassab B., Audra P. The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature. Contraception, Fertilite, Sexualite (1992) 1999;27(10):696–700. - PubMed
    1. d'Arcangues C. Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception. Contraception. 2007;75(6):S2–S7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chi I., Feldblum P. J., Rogers S. M. IUD--related uterine perforation: an epidemiologic analysis of a rare event using an international dataset. Contraceptive Delivery Systems. 1984;5(2):123–130. - PubMed
    1. Caliskan E., Oztürk N., Dilbaz B. O., Dilbaz S. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2003;8(3):150–155. doi: 10.1080/ejc.8.3.150.155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stav K., Dwyer P. L. Urinary bladder stones in women. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2012;67(11):715–725. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182735720. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources