Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0230751.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230751. eCollection 2020.

The evaluating prescription opioid changes in veterans (EPOCH) study: Design, survey response, and baseline characteristics

Affiliations

The evaluating prescription opioid changes in veterans (EPOCH) study: Design, survey response, and baseline characteristics

Erin E Krebs et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In the United States (US), long-term opioid therapy has been commonly prescribed for chronic pain. Since recognition of the opioid overdose epidemic, clinical practice guidelines have recommended tapering long-term opioids to reduced doses or discontinuation. The Effects of Prescription Opioid Changes for veterans (EPOCH) study is a national population-based prospective observational study of US Veterans Health Administration primary care patients designed to assess effects of evolving opioid prescribing practice on patients treated with long-term opioids for chronic pain. A stratified random sampling design was used to identify a survey sample from the target population of patients treated with opioid analgesics for ≥ 6 months. Demographic, diagnostic, visit, and pharmacy dispensing data were extracted from existing datasets. A 2016 mixed-mode mail and telephone survey collected patient-reported data, including the main patient-reported outcomes of pain-related function (Brief Pain Inventory interference; BPI-I scores 0-10, higher scores = worse) and health-related quality of life. Data on survey participants and non-participants were analyzed to assess potential nonresponse bias. Weights were used to account for design. Linear regression models were used to assess cross-sectional associations of opioid treatment with patient-reported measures. Of 14,160 patients contacted, 9253 (65.4%) completed the survey. Participants were older than non-participants (63.9 ± 10.6 vs. 59.6 ± 13.0 years). The mean number of bothersome pain locations was 6.8 (SE 0.04). Effectiveness of pain treatment and quality of pain care were rated fair or poor by 56.1% and 45.3%, respectively. The opioid daily dosage range was 1.6 to 1038.2 mg, with mean = 50.6 mg (SE 1.1) and median = 30.9 mg (IQR 40.7). Among the 73.2% of patients who did not receive long-acting opioids, the mean daily dosage was 30.4 mg (SE 0.6) and mean BPI-I was 6.4 (SE 00.4). Among patients who received long-acting opioids, the mean daily dosage was 106.2 mg (SE 2.8) and mean BPI-I was 6.8 (SE 0.07). Higher daily dosage was associated with worse pain-related function and quality of life among patients without long-acting opioids, but not among patients with long-acting opioids. Future analyses will use follow-up data to examine effects of opioid dose reduction and discontinuation on patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study flow diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Bothersome pain locations in the past 6 months among survey cohort participants (n = 9074).
Values are weighted percentages for each response option.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Density of mean daily dosage by opioid formulation (long-acting opioid versus no long-acting opioid) in 6 months before the index date among a) survey cohort patients and b) eligible patients.
Panel 3a: Survey cohort patients with daily dosage < 200 ME mg (n = 8946). Panel 3b: All eligible patients with daily dosage < 200 ME mg (n = 264,321). Blue = long-acting opioid; yellow = no long-acting opioid. Patients with daily dosage ≥ 200 ME mg are not shown. Panel 3a shows 8946 survey cohort participants with daily dose <200 ME mg (296 with a long-acting opioid and 11 without a long-acting opioid who had daily dosage ≥ 200 ME mg are not shown). Panel 3b shows 264,321 eligible patients with daily dose <200 ME mg (7217 with a long-acting opioid and 354 without a long-acting opioid who had daily dosage ≥ 200 ME mg are not shown).

References

    1. Mojtabai R. National trends in long-term use of prescription opioids. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(5):526–34. Epub 2017/09/08. 10.1002/pds.4278 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hadlandsmyth K, Mosher H, Vander Weg MW, Lund BC. Decline in Prescription Opioids Attributable to Decreases in Long-Term Use: A Retrospective Study in the Veterans Health Administration 2010–2016. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(6):818–24. Epub 2018/01/31. 10.1007/s11606-017-4283-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bohnert AS, Valenstein M, Bair MJ, Ganoczy D, McCarthy JF, Ilgen MA, et al. Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. Jama. 2011;305(13):1315–21. 305/13/1315 [pii]; 10.1001/jama.2011.370 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liang Y, Turner BJ. Assessing risk for drug overdose in a national cohort: role for both daily and total opioid dose? J Pain. 2015;16(4):318–25. Epub 2014/12/09. 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller M, Barber CW, Leatherman S, Fonda J, Hermos JA, Cho K, et al. Prescription opioid duration of action and the risk of unintentional overdose among patients receiving opioid therapy. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):608–15. Epub 2015/02/17. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8071 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances