Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 3:2020:7451683.
doi: 10.1155/2020/7451683. eCollection 2020.

Knee Joint Biomechanics in Physiological Conditions and How Pathologies Can Affect It: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Knee Joint Biomechanics in Physiological Conditions and How Pathologies Can Affect It: A Systematic Review

Li Zhang et al. Appl Bionics Biomech. .

Abstract

The knee joint, as the main lower limb motor joint, is the most vulnerable and susceptible joint. The knee injuries considerably impact the normal living ability and mental health of patients. Understanding the biomechanics of a normal and diseased knee joint is in urgent need for designing knee assistive devices and optimizing a rehabilitation exercise program. In this paper, we systematically searched electronic databases (from 2000 to November 2019) including ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and IEEE/IET Electronic Library for potentially relevant articles. After duplicates were removed and inclusion criteria applied to the titles, abstracts, and full text, 138 articles remained for review. The selected articles were divided into two groups to be analyzed. Firstly, the real movement of a normal knee joint and the normal knee biomechanics of four kinds of daily motions in the sagittal and coronal planes, which include normal walking, running, stair climbing, and sit-to-stand, were discussed and analyzed. Secondly, an overview of the current knowledge on the movement biomechanical effects of common knee musculoskeletal disorders and knee neurological disorders were provided. Finally, a discussion of the existing problems in the current studies and some recommendation for future research were presented. In general, this review reveals that there is no clear assessment about the biomechanics of normal and diseased knee joints at the current state of the art. The biomechanics properties could be significantly affected by knee musculoskeletal or neurological disorders. Deeper understanding of the biomechanics of the normal and diseased knee joint will still be an urgent need in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PRISMA flow diagram of study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A sketch map of motion and the typical curves of knee angle, moment, and power in the sagittal plane for a walking gait cycle. (a) Sketch map of walking motion [14]. (b) Knee angle-time curve ((A) first peak knee flexion angle, (B) first peak knee extension angle, (C) second peak knee flexion angle, and (D) second peak knee extension angle). (c) Knee moment-time curve ((E) first peak knee extension moment, (F) first peak knee flexion moment, (G) second peak knee extension moment, and (H) second peak knee flexion moment). (d) Knee power-time curve ((I) first peak knee absorption power, (J) first peak knee generation power, (K) second peak knee absorption power, and (L) third peak knee absorption power) [16, 17].
Figure 3
Figure 3
A sketch map of motion and the typical curves of knee angle, moment, and power in the sagittal plane for a running cycle. (a) Sketch map of running motion [14]. (b) Knee angle-time curve ((A) first peak knee flexion angle, (B) first peak knee extension angle, (C) second peak knee flexion angle, and (D) second peak knee extension angle). (c) Knee moment-time curve ((E) first peak knee extension moment, (F) first peak knee flexion moment, (G) second peak knee extension moment, and (H) second peak knee flexion moment). (d) Knee power-time curve ((I) first peak knee absorption power, (J) first peak knee generation power, (K) second peak knee absorption power, and (L) third peak knee absorption power) [23, 122, 123].
Figure 4
Figure 4
A sketch map of motion and the typical curves of knee angle, moment, and power in sagittal plane for stair ascent and stair descent. (a) Sketch map of the stair ascent and stair descent motion. (b) Knee angle-time curve ((A) peak knee flexion angle and (B) peak knee extension angle. (c) Knee moment-time curve ((E) first peak knee extension moment, (F) first peak knee flexion moment, (G) second peak knee extension moment, and (H) second peak knee flexion moment). (d) Knee power-time curve ((I) first peak knee generation power, (J) first peak knee absorption power, (K) second peak knee generation power, and (L) second peak knee absorption power) [24, 25].
Figure 5
Figure 5
A sketch map of motion and the typical curves of knee angle, moment, and power in the sagittal plane for sit-to-stand. (a) Sketch map of sit-to-stand cycle [28]. (b) Knee angle-time curve ((A) peak knee flexion angle and (B) peak knee extension angle). (c) Knee moment-time curve ((E) peak knee extension moment and (F) peak knee flexion moment). (d) knee power-time curve ((I) peak knee generation power) [37, 124].
Figure 6
Figure 6
The moment-angle (stiffness) curves of the knee joint for normal walking, running, stair climbing, and sit-to-stand. (a) Normal walking [20, 34]. (b) Running [35, 36]. (c) Stair ascent and stair descent [24]. (d) Sit-to-stand [37].
Figure 7
Figure 7
The knee alignment measurement methods and the effect of KOA on flexion angle and adduction moment. (a) Sketch map of HKAA, mLDFA, MPTA, and MAD [61]. (b) Knee flexion angles of health and KOA individuals [48]. (c) Knee adduction moments of health and KOA subjects [48].

References

    1. Chhabra A., Elliott C. C., Miller M. D. Normal anatomy and biomechanics of the knee. Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. 2001;9(3):166–177. doi: 10.1097/00132585-200107000-00002. - DOI
    1. Wehbi F. E. Z., Huo W., Amirat Y., El Rafei M., Khalil M., Mohammed S. Active impedance control of a knee-joint orthosis during swing phase. 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); 2017; London, UK. pp. 435–440. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shamaei K., Cenciarini M., Adams A. A., Gregorczyk K. N., Schiffman J. M., Dollar A. M. Design and evaluation of a quasi-passive knee exoskeleton for investigation of motor adaptation in lower extremity Joints. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2014;61(6):1809–1821. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2307698. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madeti B. K., Chalamalasetti S. R., Bolla Pragada S. K. S. Biomechanics of knee joint — a review. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering. 2015;10(2, article 306):176–186. doi: 10.1007/s11465-014-0306-x. - DOI
    1. Masouros S. D., Bull A. M. J., Amis A. A. (i) Biomechanics of the knee joint. Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2010;24(2):84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2010.03.005. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources