The Health Care Chief Wellness Officer: What the Role Is and Is Not
- PMID: 32324635
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003433
The Health Care Chief Wellness Officer: What the Role Is and Is Not
Abstract
Occupational distress among clinicians and its impact on quality of care is a major threat to the health care delivery system. To address threats to clinician well-being, many institutions have introduced a new senior leadership position-the health care chief wellness officer (CWO). This role is distinct from CWOs or other wellness leadership positions that have historically existed outside of medicine. The health care CWO role was established to reduce widespread occupational distress in clinicians by improving the work environment rather than by promoting health behaviors to reduce health insurance costs. A complex array of system-level drivers has contributed to clinician distress. Developing and overseeing the execution of a strategy to address these challenges and working in partnership with other operational leaders to improve well-being require a correctly placed senior leader with the appropriate authority and resources, such as a CWO.Health care CWOs must focus primarily on improving their organizations' work environment and culture, not on developing individual-level interventions, such as personal resilience, mindfulness, and self-care offerings. The goal of this work is to address what is wrong with the practice environment, not to make individuals better able to tolerate a broken system. Metrics to evaluate organizational progress as well as the efficacy of the health care CWO and his or her team are discussed in this Perspective. Occupational distress in clinicians is widespread and has implications for quality of care. Vanguard organizations have begun to put into place the leaders, infrastructure, and improvement teams necessary to address this issue. The health care CWO plays a critical role in the effectiveness of these efforts.
Comment in
-
From Clinician to Organizational Wellness.Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1627. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003669. Acad Med. 2020. PMID: 33109962 No abstract available.
-
In Reply to Egener.Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1627-1628. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003668. Acad Med. 2020. PMID: 33109963 No abstract available.
References
-
- Song Z, Baicker K. Effect of a workplace wellness program on employee health and economic outcomes: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:1491–1501.
-
- World Health Organization. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. QD85 Burn-out. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fent.... Published April 2019. Accessed February 14, 2020.
-
- Shanafelt TD, West CP, Sinsky C, et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2017. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94:1681–1694.
-
- Dyrbye LN, West CP, Johnson PO, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration among nurses. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;61:689–698.
-
- Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive leadership and physician well-being: Nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:129–146.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
