Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;33(3):299-304.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000851.

Anesthetic considerations for repeat cesarean section

Affiliations
Review

Anesthetic considerations for repeat cesarean section

Alexander Ioscovich et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The prevalence of cesarean delivery is increasing worldwide despite the advance of Trial of Labor After Cesarean section. In many countries, a history of previous cesarean section is an almost absolute indication for a repeat cesarean section. The purpose of this review was to examine if the perioperative anesthetic management of patients with repeat cesarean section is different from the anesthetic management of patients with primary cesarean section.

Recent findings: This review discusses important topics, such as early diagnosis of cases with a potentially high risk for complications; the need for assessment of patients diagnosed with abnormal placentation; the importance of a multidisciplinary approach that includes interaction of the anesthesiologist, gynaecologist, and invasive radiologist; emphasizing the need for reinforcement of new methods of invasive procedures; management of massive bleeding, use of new technologies, and development of an institutional protocol for management of patients with abnormal placentation.

Summary: According to this review, we show that the management of patients with repeat cesarean section without abnormal placentation is almost the same as the management of patients for primary cesarean section. Timely diagnosis of patient with abnormal placentation and multidisciplinary approach is crucial for prevention of morbidity or even mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ginosar Y, Ioscovich A, Weissman C, et al. Comparison of the obstetric anesthesia activity index with total delivery numbers as a single denominator of workload demand in Israeli maternity units. Isr J Health Policy Res 2012; 1:48.
    1. Martin JA, Wilson EC, Osterman MJ, et al. Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: results from two states. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62:1–19.
    1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018; 392:1341–1348.
    1. Ming Y, Li M, Dai F, et al. Dissecting the current caesarean section rate in Shanghai, China. Sci Rep 2019; 9:2080.
    1. Badakhsh MH, Seifoddin M, Khodakarami N, et al. Rise in cesarean section rate over a 30-year period in a public hospital in Tehran, Iran. Arch Iran Med 2012; 15:4–7.