Response to the Comment on "Neyman's Bias in Online Voluntary Databases!"
- PMID: 32324688
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003898
Response to the Comment on "Neyman's Bias in Online Voluntary Databases!"
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Predictive Factors and Risk Model for Positive Circumferential Resection Margin Rate After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in 2653 Patients With Rectal Cancer.Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):884-891. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003516. Ann Surg. 2019. PMID: 31634183
-
Comment on: "Neyman's Bias in Online Voluntary Databases!".Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e701-e702. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003900. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 33006453 No abstract available.
References
-
- Roodbeen SX, De Lacy FB, Van Dieren S, et al. Predictive factors and risk model for positive circumferential resection margin rate after transanal total mesorectal excision in 2653 patients with rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2019; 270:884–891.
-
- Hompes R, Arnold S, Warusavitarne J. Towards the safe introduction of transanal total mesorectal excision: the role of a clinical registry. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16:498–501.
-
- McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009; 374:1105–1112.
-
- Hill G, Connelly J, Hebert R, et al. Neyman's bias re-visited. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56:293–296.
-
- Detering R, Roodbeen SX, Van Oostendorp SE, et al. Three-year nationwide experience with transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in the Netherlands: a propensity score-matched comparison with conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 228:235–244.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
