Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231962.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231962. eCollection 2020.

Compromised angiogenesis and vascular Integrity in impaired diabetic wound healing

Affiliations

Compromised angiogenesis and vascular Integrity in impaired diabetic wound healing

Uzoagu A Okonkwo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Vascular deficits are a fundamental contributing factor of diabetes-associated diseases. Although previous studies have demonstrated that the pro-angiogenic phase of wound healing is blunted in diabetes, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms that regulate skin revascularization and capillary stabilization in diabetic wounds is lacking. Using a mouse model of diabetic wound healing, we performed microCT analysis of the 3-dimensional architecture of the capillary bed. As compared to wild type, vessel surface area, branch junction number, total vessel length, and total branch number were significantly decreased in wounds of diabetic mice as compared to WT mice. Diabetic mouse wounds also had significantly increased capillary permeability and decreased pericyte coverage of capillaries. Diabetic wounds exhibited significant perturbations in the expression of factors that affect vascular regrowth, maturation and stability. Specifically, the expression of VEGF-A, Sprouty2, PEDF, LRP6, Thrombospondin 1, CXCL10, CXCR3, PDGFR-β, HB-EGF, EGFR, TGF-β1, Semaphorin3a, Neuropilin 1, angiopoietin 2, NG2, and RGS5 were down-regulated in diabetic wounds. Together, these studies provide novel information about the complexity of the perturbation of angiogenesis in diabetic wounds. Targeting factors responsible for wound resolution and vascular pruning, as well those that affect pericyte recruitment, maturation, and stability may have the potential to improve diabetic skin wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Diabetic wounds show altered 2-D and 3-D vascular architecture.
Endothelial cells were identified by CD31 staining in baseline uninjured skin (day 0) and skin wounds at days 7, 10, 14, 18 and 22 post-wounding. A) Representative fluorescence photomicrographs of CD31 staining in the wounds. Scale bar = 100μm. B). Wound vascularity. The percent area of the wound edge and wound bed occupied by CD31-positive staining. Mean ±SD, n = 5. #p<0.01. C). MicroCT images of blood vessels in day 10 wounds of WT and diabetic mice. Scale bar = 1mm. D-I). Total vessel surface area, number of branch junctions, total branch length in (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT), total number of branches, total vessel volume, and the number of branches grouped by branch length, respectively, based on microCT image analysis. *p<0.05. n = 4 in WT group and 6 in diabetic group.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Diabetic wounds show increased amounts of vessel leakage and decreased pericyte coverage.
A). Representative fluorescence photomicrographs of CD31- and DAPI-stained FITC-dextran perfused wounds. Scale bar = 100μm. B). The percent of extravascular FITC-dextran. *p>0.05, n = 5. C). The percent of intravascular FITC-dextran. n = 5. D). Comparative levels of endothelial cell—pericyte association, expressed as the percent of CD31+ vessels not colocalized with desmin, p<0.01, n = 5. E). Representative fluorescence photomicrographs of CD31- and desmin-stained uninjured skin (US), days 10 and 18 wounds. Scale bar = 100μm.
Fig 3
Fig 3
A-G) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors over the time course of wound healing. n = 5, *p<0.05, #p<0.01. H) Heatmap summarizing findings of A-G, showing genes with no difference (gray boxes)significant downregulation (white boxes) or upregulation (black boxes) over the time course of healing in db/db versus WT mice. In the figure, factors are identified using common protein name abbreviations; for gene symbols see Table 3.
Fig 4
Fig 4
A-L) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of capillary pericyte recruitment and stabilization factors in wounds over the time course of wound healing. n = 5, *p>0.05, #p<0.01. M) Heatmap summarizing findings of A-L, showing genes with no difference (gray boxes) significant downregulation (white boxes) or upregulation (black boxes) over the time course of healing in db/db versus WT mice. In the figure, factors are identified using common protein name abbreviations; for gene symbols see Table 3.
Fig 5
Fig 5
A-D) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of pericyte markers in mouse diabetic wounds over the time course of wound healing. n = 5, *p>0.05, #p<0.01. E) Heatmap summarizing findings of A-D, showing genes with no difference (gray boxes) significant downregulation (white boxes) or upregulation (black boxes) over the time course of healing in db/db versus WT mice. In the figure, factors are identified using common protein name abbreviations; for gene symbols see Table 3.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. 2017.
    1. Nathan DM. Long-Term Complications of Diabetes Mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(23):1676–85. 10.1056/NEJM199306103282306 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alavi A, Sibbald RG, Mayer D, Goodman L, Botros M, Armstrong DG, et al. Diabetic foot ulcers: Part I. Pathophysiology and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(1). - PubMed
    1. Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KGKG. Diabetic foot ulcers. The Lancet. 2003;361(9368):1545–51. - PubMed
    1. Martins-Mendes D, Monteiro-Soares M, Boyko EJ, Ribeiro M, Barata P, Lima J, et al. The independent contribution of diabetic foot ulcer on lower extremity amputation and mortality risk. J Diabetes Complications. 2013;28(5):632–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms